Enhancing uncertainty quantification in drug discovery with censored regression labels

Emma Svensson , Hannah Rosa Friesacher , Susanne Winiwarter , Lewis Mervin , Adam Arany , Ola Engkvist
{"title":"Enhancing uncertainty quantification in drug discovery with censored regression labels","authors":"Emma Svensson ,&nbsp;Hannah Rosa Friesacher ,&nbsp;Susanne Winiwarter ,&nbsp;Lewis Mervin ,&nbsp;Adam Arany ,&nbsp;Ola Engkvist","doi":"10.1016/j.ailsci.2025.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the early stages of drug discovery, decisions regarding which experiments to pursue can be influenced by computational models for quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR). These decisions are critical due to the time-consuming and expensive nature of the experiments. Therefore, it is becoming essential to accurately quantify the uncertainty in machine learning predictions, such that resources can be used optimally and trust in the models improves. While computational methods for QSAR modeling often suffer from limited data and sparse experimental observations, additional information can exist in the form of censored labels that provide thresholds rather than precise values of observations. However, the standard approaches that quantify uncertainty in machine learning cannot fully utilize censored labels. In this work, we adapt ensemble-based, Bayesian, and Gaussian models with tools to learn from censored labels by using the Tobit model from survival analysis. Our results demonstrate that despite the partial information available in censored labels, they are essential to reliably estimate uncertainties in real pharmaceutical settings where approximately one-third or more of experimental labels are censored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72304,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence in the life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667318525000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the early stages of drug discovery, decisions regarding which experiments to pursue can be influenced by computational models for quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR). These decisions are critical due to the time-consuming and expensive nature of the experiments. Therefore, it is becoming essential to accurately quantify the uncertainty in machine learning predictions, such that resources can be used optimally and trust in the models improves. While computational methods for QSAR modeling often suffer from limited data and sparse experimental observations, additional information can exist in the form of censored labels that provide thresholds rather than precise values of observations. However, the standard approaches that quantify uncertainty in machine learning cannot fully utilize censored labels. In this work, we adapt ensemble-based, Bayesian, and Gaussian models with tools to learn from censored labels by using the Tobit model from survival analysis. Our results demonstrate that despite the partial information available in censored labels, they are essential to reliably estimate uncertainties in real pharmaceutical settings where approximately one-third or more of experimental labels are censored.

Abstract Image

用删节回归标签增强药物发现中的不确定度量化
在药物发现的早期阶段,关于进行哪些实验的决定可能受到定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)计算模型的影响。由于实验的耗时和昂贵,这些决定是至关重要的。因此,准确量化机器学习预测中的不确定性变得至关重要,这样资源才能得到最佳利用,并提高对模型的信任。虽然QSAR建模的计算方法经常受到有限的数据和稀疏的实验观测的影响,但额外的信息可以以审查标签的形式存在,这些标签提供了阈值,而不是观测的精确值。然而,量化机器学习中不确定性的标准方法不能充分利用审查标签。在这项工作中,我们采用基于集成、贝叶斯和高斯模型的工具,通过使用生存分析中的Tobit模型从审查标签中学习。我们的结果表明,尽管在审查标签中提供部分信息,但它们对于可靠地估计真实制药环境中的不确定性至关重要,其中大约三分之一或更多的实验标签被审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial intelligence in the life sciences
Artificial intelligence in the life sciences Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Computer Science Applications, Health Informatics, Drug Discovery, Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine (General)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信