EVFL-DCs: Enhancing verifiability of federated learning by double commitments based on blockchain

IF 4.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Qianjin Wei , Xuanjing Wu , Zhiquan Liu , Gang Rao
{"title":"EVFL-DCs: Enhancing verifiability of federated learning by double commitments based on blockchain","authors":"Qianjin Wei ,&nbsp;Xuanjing Wu ,&nbsp;Zhiquan Liu ,&nbsp;Gang Rao","doi":"10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In decentralized federated learning networks, the presence of malicious users can lead to distrust among participants, significantly undermining the efficiency of model training. Polynomial commitment techniques map gradients into polynomials and have been widely used in decentralized federated learning schemes. However, existing schemes have yet to address the consistency issue between noisy or masked gradients and their corresponding commitments, specifically the verification of whether a commitment is derived from the original gradient of the noisy or masked gradient. To address this issue, this paper proposes an Enhancing Verifiability and Privacy-Preserving of Federated Learning by Double Commitments based on Blockchain (EVFL-DCs). This scheme addresses the consistency issue between noisy gradients and commitments by designing two commitments based on the statistical properties of differential privacy. In the verification committee, the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is used to constrain the difference between a noisy gradient and the double commitments, ensuring their consistency. Additionally, the scheme achieves lossless aggregation by aggregating masked gradients. Given that attackers may upload masked gradients inconsistent with their signature commitments, a grouped verification mechanism is introduced. This mechanism refines the scope of consistency verification between masked gradients and commitments by performing aggregation within groups and verifying the consistency of the aggregated gradients and commitments for each group. Even if the verification fails for a particular group, the results of the other groups remain unaffected, thereby ensuring the correctness of the overall aggregation result. Experimental results demonstrate that EVFL-DCs effectively verifies the consistency between noisy or masked gradients and their commitments. Moreover, when the proportion of deceptive attackers is less than 30%, the model’s accuracy is nearly identical to that of a decentralized federated learning scheme without attackers. Furthermore, even when noise impacts the gradients, the accuracy of filtering benign noisy gradients is close to that of filtering benign original gradients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50637,"journal":{"name":"Computer Networks","volume":"260 ","pages":"Article 111097"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128625000659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In decentralized federated learning networks, the presence of malicious users can lead to distrust among participants, significantly undermining the efficiency of model training. Polynomial commitment techniques map gradients into polynomials and have been widely used in decentralized federated learning schemes. However, existing schemes have yet to address the consistency issue between noisy or masked gradients and their corresponding commitments, specifically the verification of whether a commitment is derived from the original gradient of the noisy or masked gradient. To address this issue, this paper proposes an Enhancing Verifiability and Privacy-Preserving of Federated Learning by Double Commitments based on Blockchain (EVFL-DCs). This scheme addresses the consistency issue between noisy gradients and commitments by designing two commitments based on the statistical properties of differential privacy. In the verification committee, the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) is used to constrain the difference between a noisy gradient and the double commitments, ensuring their consistency. Additionally, the scheme achieves lossless aggregation by aggregating masked gradients. Given that attackers may upload masked gradients inconsistent with their signature commitments, a grouped verification mechanism is introduced. This mechanism refines the scope of consistency verification between masked gradients and commitments by performing aggregation within groups and verifying the consistency of the aggregated gradients and commitments for each group. Even if the verification fails for a particular group, the results of the other groups remain unaffected, thereby ensuring the correctness of the overall aggregation result. Experimental results demonstrate that EVFL-DCs effectively verifies the consistency between noisy or masked gradients and their commitments. Moreover, when the proportion of deceptive attackers is less than 30%, the model’s accuracy is nearly identical to that of a decentralized federated learning scheme without attackers. Furthermore, even when noise impacts the gradients, the accuracy of filtering benign noisy gradients is close to that of filtering benign original gradients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Networks
Computer Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
434
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Computer Networks is an international, archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in the computer communications networking area. The audience includes researchers, managers and operators of networks as well as designers and implementors. The Editorial Board will consider any material for publication that is of interest to those groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信