ProstAtlasDiff: Prostate cancer detection on MRI using Diffusion Probabilistic Models guided by population spatial cancer atlases

IF 10.7 1区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Cynthia Xinran Li , Indrani Bhattacharya , Sulaiman Vesal , Pejman Ghanouni , Hassan Jahanandish , Richard E. Fan , Geoffrey A. Sonn , Mirabela Rusu
{"title":"ProstAtlasDiff: Prostate cancer detection on MRI using Diffusion Probabilistic Models guided by population spatial cancer atlases","authors":"Cynthia Xinran Li ,&nbsp;Indrani Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Sulaiman Vesal ,&nbsp;Pejman Ghanouni ,&nbsp;Hassan Jahanandish ,&nbsp;Richard E. Fan ,&nbsp;Geoffrey A. Sonn ,&nbsp;Mirabela Rusu","doi":"10.1016/j.media.2025.103486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to detect prostate cancer, yet its interpretation can be challenging due to subtle differences between benign and cancerous tissue. Recently, Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have shown great utility for medical image segmentation, modeling the process as noise removal in standard Gaussian distributions. In this study, we further enhance DDPMs by introducing the knowledge that the occurrence of cancer varies across the prostate (e.g., <span><math><mo>∼</mo></math></span>70% of prostate cancers occur in the peripheral zone). We quantify such heterogeneity with a registration pipeline to calculate voxel-level cancer distribution mean and variances. Our proposed approach, ProstAtlasDiff, relies on DDPMs that use the cancer atlas to model noise removal and segment cancer on MRI. We trained and evaluated the performance of ProstAtlasDiff in detecting clinically significant cancer in a multi-institution multi-scanner dataset, and compared it with alternative models. In a lesion-level evaluation, ProstAtlasDiff achieved statistically significantly higher accuracy (0.91 vs. 0.85, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>), specificity (0.91 vs. 0.84, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>), positive predictive value (PPV, 0.50 vs. 0.35, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>001</mn></mrow></math></span>), compared to alternative models. ProstAtlasDiff also offers more accurate cancer outlines, achieving a higher Dice Coefficient (0.33 vs. 0.31, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>). Furthermore, we evaluated ProstAtlasDiff in an independent cohort of 91 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to compare its performance to that of radiologists, relative to whole-mount histopathology ground truth. ProstAtlasDiff detected 16% (15 lesions out of 93) more clinically significant cancers compared to radiologists (sensitivity: 0.90 vs. 0.75, <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>&lt;</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>), and was comparable in terms of ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, PPV, accuracy, and Dice coefficient (<span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>05</mn></mrow></math></span>). Furthermore, we evaluated ProstAtlasDiff in a second independent cohort of 537 subjects and observed that ProsAtlasDiff outperformed alternative approaches. These results suggest that ProstAltasDiff has the potential to assist in localizing cancer for biopsy guidance and treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18328,"journal":{"name":"Medical image analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 103486"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical image analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841525000349","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used to detect prostate cancer, yet its interpretation can be challenging due to subtle differences between benign and cancerous tissue. Recently, Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) have shown great utility for medical image segmentation, modeling the process as noise removal in standard Gaussian distributions. In this study, we further enhance DDPMs by introducing the knowledge that the occurrence of cancer varies across the prostate (e.g., 70% of prostate cancers occur in the peripheral zone). We quantify such heterogeneity with a registration pipeline to calculate voxel-level cancer distribution mean and variances. Our proposed approach, ProstAtlasDiff, relies on DDPMs that use the cancer atlas to model noise removal and segment cancer on MRI. We trained and evaluated the performance of ProstAtlasDiff in detecting clinically significant cancer in a multi-institution multi-scanner dataset, and compared it with alternative models. In a lesion-level evaluation, ProstAtlasDiff achieved statistically significantly higher accuracy (0.91 vs. 0.85, p<0.001), specificity (0.91 vs. 0.84, p<0.001), positive predictive value (PPV, 0.50 vs. 0.35, p<0.001), compared to alternative models. ProstAtlasDiff also offers more accurate cancer outlines, achieving a higher Dice Coefficient (0.33 vs. 0.31, p<0.01). Furthermore, we evaluated ProstAtlasDiff in an independent cohort of 91 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy to compare its performance to that of radiologists, relative to whole-mount histopathology ground truth. ProstAtlasDiff detected 16% (15 lesions out of 93) more clinically significant cancers compared to radiologists (sensitivity: 0.90 vs. 0.75, p<0.01), and was comparable in terms of ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, PPV, accuracy, and Dice coefficient (p0.05). Furthermore, we evaluated ProstAtlasDiff in a second independent cohort of 537 subjects and observed that ProsAtlasDiff outperformed alternative approaches. These results suggest that ProstAltasDiff has the potential to assist in localizing cancer for biopsy guidance and treatment planning.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical image analysis
Medical image analysis 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
6.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Medical Image Analysis serves as a platform for sharing new research findings in the realm of medical and biological image analysis, with a focus on applications of computer vision, virtual reality, and robotics to biomedical imaging challenges. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original papers contributing to the fundamental science of processing, analyzing, and utilizing medical and biological images. It welcomes approaches utilizing biomedical image datasets across all spatial scales, from molecular/cellular imaging to tissue/organ imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信