Patricia Martínez-Botía, Samuel Tassi Yunga, Paulina Szklanna, Ozgun Babur, Andrew Emili, Phillip A Wilmarth, Johan W M Heemskerk, Patricia B Maguire, Aaron F J Iding, Sofia Ramström, Ángel García, Joseph E Aslan, Laura Gutiérrez
{"title":"Toward standardization and a concerted vision for platelet proteomics research: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.","authors":"Patricia Martínez-Botía, Samuel Tassi Yunga, Paulina Szklanna, Ozgun Babur, Andrew Emili, Phillip A Wilmarth, Johan W M Heemskerk, Patricia B Maguire, Aaron F J Iding, Sofia Ramström, Ángel García, Joseph E Aslan, Laura Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past 3 decades, omics technologies have revolutionized our understanding of platelet molecular content and organization, enabling the systematic analyses of platelet physiology. Among these approaches, proteomics has been especially significant in discovering as well as validating molecular mechanisms of platelet function in health and disease. However, several conceptual and practical challenges continue to limit the full utility of platelet proteomics tools and data. Methodological and analytical inconsistencies remain a key concern, with biological and technical variables exerting substantial influence on study outcomes and interpretation. These issues are compounded by the rapid pace of proteomics tool development and dataset collection, outstripping efforts to standardize best practices and ensure consensus, as platelet proteomics consolidates itself as a tool for research even outside the thrombosis and hemostasis field. In this communication from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee, we highlight recent advances in platelet proteomics studies, and we identify where collective efforts can strengthen experimental design, execution, and analysis. As a practical recommendation, we encourage platelet biologists to recognize current discrepancies and advance efforts to standardize and customize methods and reporting practices, including blood collection, platelet isolation, data acquisition, and data interpretation. By aligning protocols and ensuring detailed reporting, the field can more effectively integrate proteomics findings and accelerate our understanding of platelet biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":17326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.02.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over the past 3 decades, omics technologies have revolutionized our understanding of platelet molecular content and organization, enabling the systematic analyses of platelet physiology. Among these approaches, proteomics has been especially significant in discovering as well as validating molecular mechanisms of platelet function in health and disease. However, several conceptual and practical challenges continue to limit the full utility of platelet proteomics tools and data. Methodological and analytical inconsistencies remain a key concern, with biological and technical variables exerting substantial influence on study outcomes and interpretation. These issues are compounded by the rapid pace of proteomics tool development and dataset collection, outstripping efforts to standardize best practices and ensure consensus, as platelet proteomics consolidates itself as a tool for research even outside the thrombosis and hemostasis field. In this communication from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee, we highlight recent advances in platelet proteomics studies, and we identify where collective efforts can strengthen experimental design, execution, and analysis. As a practical recommendation, we encourage platelet biologists to recognize current discrepancies and advance efforts to standardize and customize methods and reporting practices, including blood collection, platelet isolation, data acquisition, and data interpretation. By aligning protocols and ensuring detailed reporting, the field can more effectively integrate proteomics findings and accelerate our understanding of platelet biology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (JTH) serves as the official journal of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It is dedicated to advancing science related to thrombosis, bleeding disorders, and vascular biology through the dissemination and exchange of information and ideas within the global research community.
Types of Publications:
The journal publishes a variety of content, including:
Original research reports
State-of-the-art reviews
Brief reports
Case reports
Invited commentaries on publications in the Journal
Forum articles
Correspondence
Announcements
Scope of Contributions:
Editors invite contributions from both fundamental and clinical domains. These include:
Basic manuscripts on blood coagulation and fibrinolysis
Studies on proteins and reactions related to thrombosis and haemostasis
Research on blood platelets and their interactions with other biological systems, such as the vessel wall, blood cells, and invading organisms
Clinical manuscripts covering various topics including venous thrombosis, arterial disease, hemophilia, bleeding disorders, and platelet diseases
Clinical manuscripts may encompass etiology, diagnostics, prognosis, prevention, and treatment strategies.