Improvements in Asthma Control After Pharmacist Involvement in an Outpatient Pediatric Asthma Clinic.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lauren Anthony, Sandra Axtell, Bianca Nixon
{"title":"Improvements in Asthma Control After Pharmacist Involvement in an Outpatient Pediatric Asthma Clinic.","authors":"Lauren Anthony, Sandra Axtell, Bianca Nixon","doi":"10.1177/08971900251320740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Asthma is one of the most common pediatric disease states. However, current literature about outpatient pharmacy appointment effectiveness on pediatric asthma control is not widely available. <b>Objective:</b> To determine whether outpatient pharmacist visits in pediatric patients with asthma result in a measurable difference in asthma control, utilizing the validated asthma control test (ACT) and childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) scoring tools. <b>Methods:</b> This study enrolled 16 children ages 6-17 years old at an outpatient primary care clinic (November 2023-April 2024). The patients visited the outpatient pharmacist 2 to 3 times over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the change in the patient's ACT or C-ACT from the baseline to the final study visit. Additional outcomes of interest included improvement in inhaler technique using a Vitalograph AIM® device, medication adherence rates, and change in emergent interventions from 6 months before enrollment compared to 3 months after the final visit. <b>Results:</b> The median improvement in asthma control test was 3 at the final study visit (4 or 12 weeks after counseling), which was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.0348). This was an improvement from 50% of patients controlled at baseline to 100% at the final visit (<i>P</i> = 0.0053). Emergent interventions including oral steroid courses, emergency department visits, and hospitalization for asthma were less common after pharmacist intervention than before enrollment (<i>P</i> = 0.0464). Improvements in technique were seen at the initial visit using Vitalograph AIM® to visualize counseling points. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study supports that outpatient pharmacist visits can have a measurable impact on pediatric asthma control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251320740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251320740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma is one of the most common pediatric disease states. However, current literature about outpatient pharmacy appointment effectiveness on pediatric asthma control is not widely available. Objective: To determine whether outpatient pharmacist visits in pediatric patients with asthma result in a measurable difference in asthma control, utilizing the validated asthma control test (ACT) and childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) scoring tools. Methods: This study enrolled 16 children ages 6-17 years old at an outpatient primary care clinic (November 2023-April 2024). The patients visited the outpatient pharmacist 2 to 3 times over a 12-week period. The primary outcome was the change in the patient's ACT or C-ACT from the baseline to the final study visit. Additional outcomes of interest included improvement in inhaler technique using a Vitalograph AIM® device, medication adherence rates, and change in emergent interventions from 6 months before enrollment compared to 3 months after the final visit. Results: The median improvement in asthma control test was 3 at the final study visit (4 or 12 weeks after counseling), which was statistically significant (P = 0.0348). This was an improvement from 50% of patients controlled at baseline to 100% at the final visit (P = 0.0053). Emergent interventions including oral steroid courses, emergency department visits, and hospitalization for asthma were less common after pharmacist intervention than before enrollment (P = 0.0464). Improvements in technique were seen at the initial visit using Vitalograph AIM® to visualize counseling points. Conclusion: Our study supports that outpatient pharmacist visits can have a measurable impact on pediatric asthma control.

背景:哮喘是儿科最常见的疾病之一:哮喘是最常见的儿科疾病之一。然而,目前有关门诊药房预约对儿科哮喘控制效果的文献并不多见。目的利用经过验证的哮喘控制测试(ACT)和儿童哮喘控制测试(C-ACT)评分工具,确定门诊药剂师访问儿科哮喘患者是否会对哮喘控制产生可测量的影响。方法:本研究在初级保健门诊(2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 4 月)招募了 16 名 6-17 岁的儿童。在为期 12 周的时间里,患者到门诊药剂师处就诊 2 到 3 次。主要结果是患者的 ACT 或 C-ACT 从基线到最终研究访问的变化。其他值得关注的结果包括使用 Vitalograph AIM® 设备改善吸入器技术、用药依从率,以及入组前 6 个月与最后一次就诊后 3 个月相比紧急干预措施的变化。结果:哮喘控制测试的中位改善率在最终研究访问(咨询后 4 周或 12 周)时为 3,具有统计学意义(P = 0.0348)。患者控制率从基线时的 50%提高到最终检查时的 100%(P = 0.0053)。药剂师干预后,包括口服类固醇疗程、急诊就诊和哮喘住院治疗在内的紧急干预措施的发生率低于入组前(P = 0.0464)。首次就诊时,使用 Vitalograph AIM® 观察咨询点的技术有所改进。结论:我们的研究证实,门诊药剂师访视可对儿科哮喘控制产生显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信