External validation and comparative performance of the SLANT score for neuroprognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors undergoing targeted temperature management: insights from an Asian cohort.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Yi-Ju Ho, Cheng-Yi Fan, Yi-Chien Kuo, Chi-Hsin Chen, Chun-Ju Lien, Chun-Hsiang Huang, Chien-Tai Huang, Sih-Shiang Huang, Ching-Yu Chen, Chih-Wei Sung, Wen-Chu Chiang, Wei-Tien Chang, Chien-Hua Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang
{"title":"External validation and comparative performance of the SLANT score for neuroprognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors undergoing targeted temperature management: insights from an Asian cohort.","authors":"Yi-Ju Ho, Cheng-Yi Fan, Yi-Chien Kuo, Chi-Hsin Chen, Chun-Ju Lien, Chun-Hsiang Huang, Chien-Tai Huang, Sih-Shiang Huang, Ching-Yu Chen, Chih-Wei Sung, Wen-Chu Chiang, Wei-Tien Chang, Chien-Hua Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan Huang","doi":"10.1186/s40560-025-00778-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depend on multiple factors, including the patient's baseline condition and post-arrest management. The SLANT, developed specifically for OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management (TTM), requires further validation, particularly in Asian populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2016 to 2023, examining demographics, pre-arrest conditions, resuscitation events, and laboratory biomarkers following TTM. The primary outcome was defined as a poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the included variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 448 eligible adult patients were included, of whom 77.9% experienced poor neurological outcomes at discharge. The performance of the current cohort was comparable to that of the original SLANT cohort, achieving an area under the curve of 0.797 (95% confidence interval: 0.746-0.849). All five factors of the SLANT score remained statistically significant in predicting poor neurological outcomes. At a cutoff of ≥ 6.5, the SLANT score demonstrated a specificity of 53.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.9%. Increasing the cutoff value to 8.5 improved the specificity to 66.7% and the PPV to 89.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLANT showed high PPV for predicting poor neurological outcomes at discharge in patients with OHCA undergoing TTM across a multicenter Asian cohort. Combining the score with other neurological assessments is recommended for improved neuroprognostication.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-025-00778-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) depend on multiple factors, including the patient's baseline condition and post-arrest management. The SLANT, developed specifically for OHCA survivors treated with targeted temperature management (TTM), requires further validation, particularly in Asian populations.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2016 to 2023, examining demographics, pre-arrest conditions, resuscitation events, and laboratory biomarkers following TTM. The primary outcome was defined as a poor neurological outcome at hospital discharge. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the included variables.

Results: A total of 448 eligible adult patients were included, of whom 77.9% experienced poor neurological outcomes at discharge. The performance of the current cohort was comparable to that of the original SLANT cohort, achieving an area under the curve of 0.797 (95% confidence interval: 0.746-0.849). All five factors of the SLANT score remained statistically significant in predicting poor neurological outcomes. At a cutoff of ≥ 6.5, the SLANT score demonstrated a specificity of 53.5% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.9%. Increasing the cutoff value to 8.5 improved the specificity to 66.7% and the PPV to 89.6%.

Conclusion: The SLANT showed high PPV for predicting poor neurological outcomes at discharge in patients with OHCA undergoing TTM across a multicenter Asian cohort. Combining the score with other neurological assessments is recommended for improved neuroprognostication.

院外心脏骤停幸存者接受目标温度管理时,斜体评分的神经预后的外部验证和比较性能:来自亚洲队列的见解。
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的神经系统预后取决于多种因素,包括患者的基线状况和骤停后处理。专为接受靶向温度管理(TTM)治疗的OHCA幸存者开发的SLANT需要进一步验证,特别是在亚洲人群中。方法:本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了2016年至2023年的数据,检查了TTM后的人口统计学、骤停前条件、复苏事件和实验室生物标志物。主要结局被定义为出院时神经系统预后差。使用接收器工作特性曲线下的面积来评估模型性能。采用多因素logistic回归分析对纳入变量进行分析。结果:共纳入448例符合条件的成年患者,其中77.9%的患者出院时神经系统预后较差。当前队列的表现与原始斜队列相当,曲线下面积为0.797(95%可信区间:0.746-0.849)。SLANT评分的所有五个因素在预测不良神经预后方面仍然具有统计学意义。当临界值≥6.5时,SLANT评分的特异性为53.5%,阳性预测值(PPV)为86.9%。将临界值提高到8.5,特异性提高到66.7%,PPV提高到89.6%。结论:在一项多中心亚洲队列研究中,SLANT显示高PPV预测OHCA患者接受TTM时出院时不良神经预后。建议将评分与其他神经学评估相结合,以改善神经预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信