Ashraf Abugroun, Saria Awadalla, Sanjay Singh, Margaret C Fang
{"title":"Development of an emergency department triage tool to predict admission or discharge for older adults.","authors":"Ashraf Abugroun, Saria Awadalla, Sanjay Singh, Margaret C Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12245-025-00825-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults present to Emergency Departments (ED) with complex conditions, requiring triage models that support effective disposition decisions. While existing models perform well in the general population, they often fall short for older patients. This study introduces a triage model aimed at improving early risk stratification and disposition planning in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2015-2019) for ED patients aged ≥ 60 years, excluding those who died in the ED or left against medical advice. Key predictors were identified using a two-step process combining LASSO and backward stepwise selection. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis. Risk thresholds (< 0.1, 0.1-0.5, > 0.5) stratified patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups, optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,431 patients, 3,180 (23.7%) were admitted. Key predictors for admission included ambulance arrival, chronic conditions, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal vital signs. The model showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.73) and good calibration, validated by 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.73, SD 0.02). Decision curve analysis highlighted net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. At thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5, the model identified 18.9% as low-risk (91.2% accuracy) and 7.9% as high-risk (57.7%). Adjusting thresholds to 0.2 and 0.4 expanded low-risk (55.4%, 87.9% accuracy) and high-risk (14.1%, 53.7% accuracy) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This older adult-focused risk score uses readily available data to enhance early discharge, prioritize admissions for high-risk patients, and enhance ED care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00825-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Older adults present to Emergency Departments (ED) with complex conditions, requiring triage models that support effective disposition decisions. While existing models perform well in the general population, they often fall short for older patients. This study introduces a triage model aimed at improving early risk stratification and disposition planning in this population.
Methods: We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2015-2019) for ED patients aged ≥ 60 years, excluding those who died in the ED or left against medical advice. Key predictors were identified using a two-step process combining LASSO and backward stepwise selection. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis. Risk thresholds (< 0.1, 0.1-0.5, > 0.5) stratified patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups, optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity.
Results: Of 13,431 patients, 3,180 (23.7%) were admitted. Key predictors for admission included ambulance arrival, chronic conditions, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal vital signs. The model showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.73) and good calibration, validated by 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.73, SD 0.02). Decision curve analysis highlighted net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. At thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5, the model identified 18.9% as low-risk (91.2% accuracy) and 7.9% as high-risk (57.7%). Adjusting thresholds to 0.2 and 0.4 expanded low-risk (55.4%, 87.9% accuracy) and high-risk (14.1%, 53.7% accuracy) groups.
Conclusions: This older adult-focused risk score uses readily available data to enhance early discharge, prioritize admissions for high-risk patients, and enhance ED care delivery.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.