Development of an emergency department triage tool to predict admission or discharge for older adults.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ashraf Abugroun, Saria Awadalla, Sanjay Singh, Margaret C Fang
{"title":"Development of an emergency department triage tool to predict admission or discharge for older adults.","authors":"Ashraf Abugroun, Saria Awadalla, Sanjay Singh, Margaret C Fang","doi":"10.1186/s12245-025-00825-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults present to Emergency Departments (ED) with complex conditions, requiring triage models that support effective disposition decisions. While existing models perform well in the general population, they often fall short for older patients. This study introduces a triage model aimed at improving early risk stratification and disposition planning in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2015-2019) for ED patients aged ≥ 60 years, excluding those who died in the ED or left against medical advice. Key predictors were identified using a two-step process combining LASSO and backward stepwise selection. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis. Risk thresholds (< 0.1, 0.1-0.5, > 0.5) stratified patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups, optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,431 patients, 3,180 (23.7%) were admitted. Key predictors for admission included ambulance arrival, chronic conditions, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal vital signs. The model showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.73) and good calibration, validated by 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.73, SD 0.02). Decision curve analysis highlighted net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. At thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5, the model identified 18.9% as low-risk (91.2% accuracy) and 7.9% as high-risk (57.7%). Adjusting thresholds to 0.2 and 0.4 expanded low-risk (55.4%, 87.9% accuracy) and high-risk (14.1%, 53.7% accuracy) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This older adult-focused risk score uses readily available data to enhance early discharge, prioritize admissions for high-risk patients, and enhance ED care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-025-00825-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults present to Emergency Departments (ED) with complex conditions, requiring triage models that support effective disposition decisions. While existing models perform well in the general population, they often fall short for older patients. This study introduces a triage model aimed at improving early risk stratification and disposition planning in this population.

Methods: We analyzed the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data (2015-2019) for ED patients aged ≥ 60 years, excluding those who died in the ED or left against medical advice. Key predictors were identified using a two-step process combining LASSO and backward stepwise selection. Model performance was evaluated using AUC and calibration plots, while clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis. Risk thresholds (< 0.1, 0.1-0.5, > 0.5) stratified patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups, optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Of 13,431 patients, 3,180 (23.7%) were admitted. Key predictors for admission included ambulance arrival, chronic conditions, gastrointestinal bleeding, and abnormal vital signs. The model showed strong discrimination (AUC 0.73) and good calibration, validated by 10-fold cross-validation (mean AUC 0.73, SD 0.02). Decision curve analysis highlighted net benefit across clinically relevant thresholds. At thresholds of 0.1 and 0.5, the model identified 18.9% as low-risk (91.2% accuracy) and 7.9% as high-risk (57.7%). Adjusting thresholds to 0.2 and 0.4 expanded low-risk (55.4%, 87.9% accuracy) and high-risk (14.1%, 53.7% accuracy) groups.

Conclusions: This older adult-focused risk score uses readily available data to enhance early discharge, prioritize admissions for high-risk patients, and enhance ED care delivery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信