Sutha Rajakumar BPharm, Retha Rajah PhD, Nur Alia Razali BPharm, Tan Xin Yan BPharm, Ooi Guat Tee BPharm
{"title":"Assessment of enoxaparin-related knowledge, administration technique, and self-reported adherence among women after caesarean section delivery","authors":"Sutha Rajakumar BPharm, Retha Rajah PhD, Nur Alia Razali BPharm, Tan Xin Yan BPharm, Ooi Guat Tee BPharm","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Venous thromboembolism is among the main causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, with caesarean section (CS) delivery carrying greater risk. Outpatient thromboprophylaxis, such as enoxaparin, is administered subcutaneously and prescribed as an outpatient; raising the issue of medication adherence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate women's adherence to enoxaparin administration after CS delivery, explore the reasons for non-adherence, and assess the factors associated with patients' adherence to enoxaparin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Women after CS delivery, who had been given enoxaparin at discharge were included in the study. Eligible patients were contacted via telephone at the middle and the end of the enoxaparin treatment. Syringe count determined the main outcome of adherence during direct telephone interviews with the patient. Optimal adherence was defined as all the doses of enoxaparin being administered and suboptimal adherence was at least one dose not administered. Ethical approval was granted by the Malaysian Registry Ethics Committee belonging to National Medical Research Registry (Reference no: NMRR ID-22-02859-P41) and the study conforms with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants through completion of written consent forms, after an explanation of the study was provided by investigators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 201 women included, the majority (91.5%) were fully adherent to enoxaparin, while 8.5% missed at least one dose. Most patients administering at home missed the dose due to reporting they were unwell (<i>n</i> = 6), busy (<i>n</i> = 4), or forgot to administer (<i>n</i> = 2). Among missed doses in patients administered in a healthcare setting, all participants (<i>n</i> = 5) forgot to bring their medication to the appointment. Only medication knowledge had a significant association with adherence to enoxaparin administration (p = 0.008).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study raised concern about the substantial percentage of patients missing at least one dose of enoxaparin, particularly among patients injecting at home. Initiatives should focus on customised enoxaparin administration counselling and providing educational materials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"61-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1943","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Venous thromboembolism is among the main causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, with caesarean section (CS) delivery carrying greater risk. Outpatient thromboprophylaxis, such as enoxaparin, is administered subcutaneously and prescribed as an outpatient; raising the issue of medication adherence.
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate women's adherence to enoxaparin administration after CS delivery, explore the reasons for non-adherence, and assess the factors associated with patients' adherence to enoxaparin.
Method
Women after CS delivery, who had been given enoxaparin at discharge were included in the study. Eligible patients were contacted via telephone at the middle and the end of the enoxaparin treatment. Syringe count determined the main outcome of adherence during direct telephone interviews with the patient. Optimal adherence was defined as all the doses of enoxaparin being administered and suboptimal adherence was at least one dose not administered. Ethical approval was granted by the Malaysian Registry Ethics Committee belonging to National Medical Research Registry (Reference no: NMRR ID-22-02859-P41) and the study conforms with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants through completion of written consent forms, after an explanation of the study was provided by investigators.
Results
Out of 201 women included, the majority (91.5%) were fully adherent to enoxaparin, while 8.5% missed at least one dose. Most patients administering at home missed the dose due to reporting they were unwell (n = 6), busy (n = 4), or forgot to administer (n = 2). Among missed doses in patients administered in a healthcare setting, all participants (n = 5) forgot to bring their medication to the appointment. Only medication knowledge had a significant association with adherence to enoxaparin administration (p = 0.008).
Conclusion
The study raised concern about the substantial percentage of patients missing at least one dose of enoxaparin, particularly among patients injecting at home. Initiatives should focus on customised enoxaparin administration counselling and providing educational materials.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.