Dipl.-Ing. Elisabeth Hauzinger, Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Schiefer, Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. mont. Robert Galler
{"title":"Reduction of CO2 emissions in tunnelling based on life cycle assessment","authors":"Dipl.-Ing. Elisabeth Hauzinger, Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Schiefer, Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. mont. Robert Galler","doi":"10.1002/geot.202400078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Major tunnelling projects, like the extension of corridors for railway lines or the construction of large underground research facilities, are flagships in the European civil engineering industry. In order to deal with matters of sustainability and material management, as much of the generated excavation material must be reused – preferably directly on the construction site to avoid CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from long transport routes. While tools for quantifying the process-relevant carbon footprint are already available in other industry sectors, there is still no generally recognized method in the civil engineering and tunnelling industry, as every construction site has its own unique requirements. To find the best utilization option with the lowest possible carbon footprint, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted, where the whole process is divided into three steps: use of construction equipment, transport, and landfilling/recycling of the excavation material. Finally, a ‘reference scenario’ for each process is determined and compared with optimized scenarios to calculate the potential of saved emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39412,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","volume":"18 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanik und Tunnelbau","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geot.202400078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Major tunnelling projects, like the extension of corridors for railway lines or the construction of large underground research facilities, are flagships in the European civil engineering industry. In order to deal with matters of sustainability and material management, as much of the generated excavation material must be reused – preferably directly on the construction site to avoid CO2 emissions from long transport routes. While tools for quantifying the process-relevant carbon footprint are already available in other industry sectors, there is still no generally recognized method in the civil engineering and tunnelling industry, as every construction site has its own unique requirements. To find the best utilization option with the lowest possible carbon footprint, a life cycle assessment (LCA) is conducted, where the whole process is divided into three steps: use of construction equipment, transport, and landfilling/recycling of the excavation material. Finally, a ‘reference scenario’ for each process is determined and compared with optimized scenarios to calculate the potential of saved emissions.
Geomechanik und TunnelbauEarth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍:
The contributions published in Geomechanics and Tunnelling deal with practical aspects of applied engineering geology, rock mechanics and rock engineering, soil mechanics and foundation engineering, and primarily tunnelling. Each issue focuses on a current topic or specific project. Brief news, reports from construction sites and news on conferences round off the content. From the start of 2009 Geomechanics and Tunnelling has been published as a bilingual English/German journal.