Carbon stocks, technological development, and milk yields of dairy cattle silvopastoral production systems in the Andean-amazon region of Colombia

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Henry Mavisoy, Edwin Castro Rincón, Adrian Rolando Riascos Vallejos, Juan Pablo Narváez-Herrera, Lorieth Rosas, Adriana del Socorro Guerra Acosta, Adrián Antonio Riascos Salcedo, Disney Magali Aguillon Alban, Carlos Chingal, André M. de Almeida, David Fangueiro
{"title":"Carbon stocks, technological development, and milk yields of dairy cattle silvopastoral production systems in the Andean-amazon region of Colombia","authors":"Henry Mavisoy,&nbsp;Edwin Castro Rincón,&nbsp;Adrian Rolando Riascos Vallejos,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Narváez-Herrera,&nbsp;Lorieth Rosas,&nbsp;Adriana del Socorro Guerra Acosta,&nbsp;Adrián Antonio Riascos Salcedo,&nbsp;Disney Magali Aguillon Alban,&nbsp;Carlos Chingal,&nbsp;André M. de Almeida,&nbsp;David Fangueiro","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01151-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research aimed to assess carbon (C) stocks (living biomass, soil and detritus) in silvopastoral systems (SPS), the C density in living biomass (CLB) at the farm level, technological adoption and milk yields in an integrated fashion in small dairy farms in the Andean-Amazon region of Colombia. Technological adoption was assessed on a scale of 0 to 100% across 26 points. Milk yields from the top 10% highest-yielding farms were used for gap analysis. The lactation period and weaning age were considered as herd management variables. The study included 30 farms classified as high, medium or low SPS coverage. The average farm size was 9.1 ± 0.8 ha<sup>−1</sup> where live fences (LF) and woodlots (WL) were the main SPS. The total C were 152.0 ± 13.8 Mg·ha-<sup>1</sup>, 152.2 ± 10.3 Mg·ha-<sup>1</sup>, and 73.2 ± 4.4 Mg·ha-<sup>1</sup> in WL, LF and pastures. Farms with high SPS coverage (10.8 ± 1.1%) presented a CLB density of 8.6 ± 2.0 Mg·ha<sup>−1</sup>, 3.4 and 43 times higher than those with medium and low coverage, respectively. Average milk yield was 3190.1 ± 237.5 kg fat and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) cow<sup>−1</sup> yr⁻<sup>1</sup>, with the top 10% of farms having 6056.7 kg·FPCM·cow<sup>−1</sup> yr⁻<sup>1</sup>. Farms with low SPS coverage had the smallest yield gap (1221.4 ± 290 kg·FPCM·cow<sup>−1</sup> yr⁻<sup>1</sup>) but also a lower average yield (2883.0 ± 290 kg·FPCM·cow⁻<sup>1</sup>·yr⁻<sup>1</sup>). The farms averaged 48.9 ± 2.1% in the technological adoption level, 271.5 ± 8.4 days of lactation period, and 129.3 ± 17.8 days of weaning age, with no significant differences across SPS levels. An integrated approach to jointly increase technology adoption, herd management, and the enhancement of SPS coverage at the farm level can reduce the yield gap while enhancing C stocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-025-01151-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01151-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to assess carbon (C) stocks (living biomass, soil and detritus) in silvopastoral systems (SPS), the C density in living biomass (CLB) at the farm level, technological adoption and milk yields in an integrated fashion in small dairy farms in the Andean-Amazon region of Colombia. Technological adoption was assessed on a scale of 0 to 100% across 26 points. Milk yields from the top 10% highest-yielding farms were used for gap analysis. The lactation period and weaning age were considered as herd management variables. The study included 30 farms classified as high, medium or low SPS coverage. The average farm size was 9.1 ± 0.8 ha−1 where live fences (LF) and woodlots (WL) were the main SPS. The total C were 152.0 ± 13.8 Mg·ha-1, 152.2 ± 10.3 Mg·ha-1, and 73.2 ± 4.4 Mg·ha-1 in WL, LF and pastures. Farms with high SPS coverage (10.8 ± 1.1%) presented a CLB density of 8.6 ± 2.0 Mg·ha−1, 3.4 and 43 times higher than those with medium and low coverage, respectively. Average milk yield was 3190.1 ± 237.5 kg fat and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) cow−1 yr⁻1, with the top 10% of farms having 6056.7 kg·FPCM·cow−1 yr⁻1. Farms with low SPS coverage had the smallest yield gap (1221.4 ± 290 kg·FPCM·cow−1 yr⁻1) but also a lower average yield (2883.0 ± 290 kg·FPCM·cow⁻1·yr⁻1). The farms averaged 48.9 ± 2.1% in the technological adoption level, 271.5 ± 8.4 days of lactation period, and 129.3 ± 17.8 days of weaning age, with no significant differences across SPS levels. An integrated approach to jointly increase technology adoption, herd management, and the enhancement of SPS coverage at the farm level can reduce the yield gap while enhancing C stocks.

哥伦比亚安第斯-亚马逊地区银山牧牛生产系统的碳储量、技术发展和产奶量
本研究旨在以综合方式评估哥伦比亚安第斯-亚马逊地区小型奶牛场的森林生态系统(SPS)中的碳(C)储量(活生物量、土壤和碎屑)、农场层面活生物量(CLB)中的碳密度、技术采用和产奶量。技术采用率的评估范围从0到100%,分为26分。产奶量排名前10%的最高农场的产奶量被用于差距分析。将哺乳期和断奶日龄作为牛群管理的变量。该研究包括30个农场,分为高、中、低SPS覆盖率。平均养殖场面积为9.1±0.8 ha−1,以围栏(LF)和林地(WL)为主。WL、LF和牧场的总碳含量分别为152.0±13.8 Mg·ha-1、152.2±10.3 Mg·ha-1和73.2±4.4 Mg·ha-1。高SPS覆盖率(10.8±1.1%)养殖场的CLB密度分别是中、低覆盖度养殖场的8.6±2.0 Mg·ha−1、3.4和43倍。平均产奶量为3190.1±237.5公斤脂肪和蛋白质校正奶(FPCM) - 1年毒毒毒毒图,前10%的农场有6056.7公斤·FPCM·牛- 1年毒毒图。SPS覆盖率低的农场产量差距最小(1221.4±290 kg·FPCM·牛- 1年毒发展),但平均产量也较低(2883.0±290 kg·FPCM·牛- 1年毒发展)。各养殖场平均技术采用水平为48.9±2.1%,泌乳期为271.5±8.4 d,断奶日龄为129.3±17.8 d, SPS水平间差异不显著。采用综合方法,在农场一级共同提高技术采用、畜群管理和SPS覆盖率,可以在增加C储量的同时缩小产量差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信