Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods
Hsiang-Tsui Wang , Ping-Huai Wang , Chun-Yu Chen , Tsung-Yun Liu , Han-Hsing Tsou
{"title":"Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods","authors":"Hsiang-Tsui Wang , Ping-Huai Wang , Chun-Yu Chen , Tsung-Yun Liu , Han-Hsing Tsou","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cigarette smoke (CS) exposes users to harmful substances, contributing to chronic lung diseases. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as safer alternatives due to their lower toxicant emissions from heating rather than burning tobacco. However, HTPs may produce unique toxicants that are not found in CS. The emissions of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) were compared using targeted analysis using liquid chromatography/ion mobility-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and untargeted analysis with UPLC-QToF and Progenesis® QI software. Targeted analysis revealed that HTP aerosol emissions contain significantly lower levels of harmful compounds compared to CS, with reductions of 8.7%–91.6% in 11 carbonyls and 85.7%–95.4% in four TSNAs) Untargeted analysis identified 25 carbonyls and seven nitrosamines in both HTPs and conventional cigarettes, with acetoin, dimethylbenzaldehyde, furfural, and diisopropanolnitrosamine (DIPN) found at relatively high levels in HTPs. While untargeted methods introduce some uncertainty, these findings underscore distinct chemical differences between HTPs and conventional cigarettes. Long-term studies are essential to fully understand the health implications of HTP use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cigarette smoke (CS) exposes users to harmful substances, contributing to chronic lung diseases. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as safer alternatives due to their lower toxicant emissions from heating rather than burning tobacco. However, HTPs may produce unique toxicants that are not found in CS. The emissions of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) were compared using targeted analysis using liquid chromatography/ion mobility-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and untargeted analysis with UPLC-QToF and Progenesis® QI software. Targeted analysis revealed that HTP aerosol emissions contain significantly lower levels of harmful compounds compared to CS, with reductions of 8.7%–91.6% in 11 carbonyls and 85.7%–95.4% in four TSNAs) Untargeted analysis identified 25 carbonyls and seven nitrosamines in both HTPs and conventional cigarettes, with acetoin, dimethylbenzaldehyde, furfural, and diisopropanolnitrosamine (DIPN) found at relatively high levels in HTPs. While untargeted methods introduce some uncertainty, these findings underscore distinct chemical differences between HTPs and conventional cigarettes. Long-term studies are essential to fully understand the health implications of HTP use.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)