Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Hsiang-Tsui Wang , Ping-Huai Wang , Chun-Yu Chen , Tsung-Yun Liu , Han-Hsing Tsou
{"title":"Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods","authors":"Hsiang-Tsui Wang ,&nbsp;Ping-Huai Wang ,&nbsp;Chun-Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Tsung-Yun Liu ,&nbsp;Han-Hsing Tsou","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cigarette smoke (CS) exposes users to harmful substances, contributing to chronic lung diseases. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as safer alternatives due to their lower toxicant emissions from heating rather than burning tobacco. However, HTPs may produce unique toxicants that are not found in CS. The emissions of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) were compared using targeted analysis using liquid chromatography/ion mobility-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and untargeted analysis with UPLC-QToF and Progenesis® QI software. Targeted analysis revealed that HTP aerosol emissions contain significantly lower levels of harmful compounds compared to CS, with reductions of 8.7%–91.6% in 11 carbonyls and 85.7%–95.4% in four TSNAs) Untargeted analysis identified 25 carbonyls and seven nitrosamines in both HTPs and conventional cigarettes, with acetoin, dimethylbenzaldehyde, furfural, and diisopropanolnitrosamine (DIPN) found at relatively high levels in HTPs. While untargeted methods introduce some uncertainty, these findings underscore distinct chemical differences between HTPs and conventional cigarettes. Long-term studies are essential to fully understand the health implications of HTP use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cigarette smoke (CS) exposes users to harmful substances, contributing to chronic lung diseases. Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are marketed as safer alternatives due to their lower toxicant emissions from heating rather than burning tobacco. However, HTPs may produce unique toxicants that are not found in CS. The emissions of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) were compared using targeted analysis using liquid chromatography/ion mobility-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and untargeted analysis with UPLC-QToF and Progenesis® QI software. Targeted analysis revealed that HTP aerosol emissions contain significantly lower levels of harmful compounds compared to CS, with reductions of 8.7%–91.6% in 11 carbonyls and 85.7%–95.4% in four TSNAs) Untargeted analysis identified 25 carbonyls and seven nitrosamines in both HTPs and conventional cigarettes, with acetoin, dimethylbenzaldehyde, furfural, and diisopropanolnitrosamine (DIPN) found at relatively high levels in HTPs. While untargeted methods introduce some uncertainty, these findings underscore distinct chemical differences between HTPs and conventional cigarettes. Long-term studies are essential to fully understand the health implications of HTP use.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信