An integrative review of healthcare professionals’ experiences in caring for women who have experienced psychological birth trauma or birth related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

IF 2.6 3区医学 Q1 NURSING

Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104336

Aoife O'Donoghue , Carmel Bradshaw , Annmarie Grealish

{"title":"An integrative review of healthcare professionals’ experiences in caring for women who have experienced psychological birth trauma or birth related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder","authors":"Aoife O'Donoghue , Carmel Bradshaw , Annmarie Grealish","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A significant proportion of women worldwide experience childbirth as a traumatic event, which may result in enduring consequences for themselves, their partners and their children. Healthcare professionals have a key role in supporting women with psychological birth trauma and birth related post-traumatic stress disorder through prevention, early detection and supportive practices but evidence indicates that these phenomena, are not recognised by practitioners.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework as it facilitates the inclusion of different methodological approaches into an overall synthesis of the evidence. A systematic search of four electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO was conducted between 2003 and 2024, with no geographical limits set due to the paucity of research published in this area.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Two main themes plus sub-themes were identified: (1) Knowledge and Skills (sub-themes: Communication; Clinical skills) and (2) Challenges (sub-themes: Attitudes; Resources).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Knowledge and skill deficits contribute to the difficulties healthcare professionals face when providing care to women with psychological birth trauma and birth related PTSD. A lack of referral pathways for women to receive the specialised support and treatment they require is also evidenced. This study is the first to our knowledge to examine healthcare professionals experiences of caring for women with psychological birth trauma and birth related post-traumatic stress disorder and make recommendations on how to prevent, identify and support affected women within the perinatal setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of women worldwide experience childbirth as a traumatic event, which may result in enduring consequences for themselves, their partners and their children. Healthcare professionals have a key role in supporting women with psychological birth trauma and birth related post-traumatic stress disorder through prevention, early detection and supportive practices but evidence indicates that these phenomena, are not recognised by practitioners.

Design

This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage framework as it facilitates the inclusion of different methodological approaches into an overall synthesis of the evidence. A systematic search of four electronic databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO was conducted between 2003 and 2024, with no geographical limits set due to the paucity of research published in this area.

Findings

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were synthesised using thematic synthesis. Two main themes plus sub-themes were identified: (1) Knowledge and Skills (sub-themes: Communication; Clinical skills) and (2) Challenges (sub-themes: Attitudes; Resources).

Conclusions

Knowledge and skill deficits contribute to the difficulties healthcare professionals face when providing care to women with psychological birth trauma and birth related PTSD. A lack of referral pathways for women to receive the specialised support and treatment they require is also evidenced. This study is the first to our knowledge to examine healthcare professionals experiences of caring for women with psychological birth trauma and birth related post-traumatic stress disorder and make recommendations on how to prevent, identify and support affected women within the perinatal setting.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Midwifery 医学-护理

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

7.40%

发文量

221

审稿时长

13.4 weeks

期刊介绍： Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.