Porosity distribution of 316 L stainless steel in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing due to spatial variation

IF 6.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Chen-Nan Sun , Beng Loon Aw , Hengfeng Gu , Danny Ming Tak Choi , Chong Teng , Sharon Mui Ling Nai , Aravind Vasanthakumar , Chengcheng Wang
{"title":"Porosity distribution of 316 L stainless steel in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing due to spatial variation","authors":"Chen-Nan Sun ,&nbsp;Beng Loon Aw ,&nbsp;Hengfeng Gu ,&nbsp;Danny Ming Tak Choi ,&nbsp;Chong Teng ,&nbsp;Sharon Mui Ling Nai ,&nbsp;Aravind Vasanthakumar ,&nbsp;Chengcheng Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is at the forefront of the additive manufacturing industry due to its ability to generate intricate and accurate objects layer-by-layer. However, maintaining low porosity (i.e., minimizing defects) remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the influence of spatial variations on porosity, independent of processing parameters, by fabricating SS316L cubes at various locations on the build platform with both identical and varying processing parameters (laser power and scan speed). Changes in printing location affect the incident angle between the surface normal and the laser, potentially leading to laser spot distortion and altered effective energy input. This, in turn, can influence the porosity of the printed part. Additionally, improper inert gas flow can hinder spatter removal, further increasing porosity. We demonstrate that, regardless of processing parameters, spatial variations on the build platform significantly impact porosity distribution. Our findings, consistent with existing literature, highlight the importance of optimizing both build location and processing parameters to achieve low porosity, particularly at the platform's periphery. By analyzing the optimal build locations and parameter combinations, this work provides valuable insights for LPBF practitioners seeking to minimize porosity and improve printing outcomes at peripheral regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":"139 ","pages":"Pages 81-89"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612525001720","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is at the forefront of the additive manufacturing industry due to its ability to generate intricate and accurate objects layer-by-layer. However, maintaining low porosity (i.e., minimizing defects) remains a significant challenge. This study investigates the influence of spatial variations on porosity, independent of processing parameters, by fabricating SS316L cubes at various locations on the build platform with both identical and varying processing parameters (laser power and scan speed). Changes in printing location affect the incident angle between the surface normal and the laser, potentially leading to laser spot distortion and altered effective energy input. This, in turn, can influence the porosity of the printed part. Additionally, improper inert gas flow can hinder spatter removal, further increasing porosity. We demonstrate that, regardless of processing parameters, spatial variations on the build platform significantly impact porosity distribution. Our findings, consistent with existing literature, highlight the importance of optimizing both build location and processing parameters to achieve low porosity, particularly at the platform's periphery. By analyzing the optimal build locations and parameter combinations, this work provides valuable insights for LPBF practitioners seeking to minimize porosity and improve printing outcomes at peripheral regions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Journal of Manufacturing Processes ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
11.30%
发文量
833
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信