Strategies for combining interventional and behavioral therapies in management of chronic low back pain: A scoping review

Jasmina Solankee , Royce Sumayo , Thiru M. Annaswamy
{"title":"Strategies for combining interventional and behavioral therapies in management of chronic low back pain: A scoping review","authors":"Jasmina Solankee ,&nbsp;Royce Sumayo ,&nbsp;Thiru M. Annaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Common non-surgical treatment approaches for chronic low back pain (CLBP) include pharmacologic, interventional and behavioral therapies, but there is no consensus treatment approach. Despite studies that show the effectiveness of interventional and behavioral approaches individually and evidence-based recommendations for multimodal treatment approach, specific stacking and sequencing strategies used to combine both approaches haven't been studied.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objectives of this scoping review were to: 1) explore how interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP treatment are stacked or sequenced; 2) evaluate the feasibility of utilizing interventional and behavioral treatments in an integrative manner, and 3) assess whether optimal combinations of interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP treatment exist.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search of indexed and gray literature was conducted for studies involving the combination of interventional and behavioral therapies for treatment of CLBP. 374 abstracts and 72 records of gray literature were independently screened followed by 60 that underwent full-text review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of three studies were included in this review, all of which found the integration of modalities to be feasible. Two studies that utilized non-conventional interventions found no significant treatment effect by combining modalities. One study demonstrated a non-significant additive effect of combining radiofrequency ablation with cognitive behavioral therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite known individual benefits, there are limited studies exploring combined interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP. Given the feasibility and the additive effects of combining interventions with behavioral therapy seen in the studies included this review, further exploration of this subject is needed to guide clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Common non-surgical treatment approaches for chronic low back pain (CLBP) include pharmacologic, interventional and behavioral therapies, but there is no consensus treatment approach. Despite studies that show the effectiveness of interventional and behavioral approaches individually and evidence-based recommendations for multimodal treatment approach, specific stacking and sequencing strategies used to combine both approaches haven't been studied.

Objectives

The objectives of this scoping review were to: 1) explore how interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP treatment are stacked or sequenced; 2) evaluate the feasibility of utilizing interventional and behavioral treatments in an integrative manner, and 3) assess whether optimal combinations of interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP treatment exist.

Methods

A literature search of indexed and gray literature was conducted for studies involving the combination of interventional and behavioral therapies for treatment of CLBP. 374 abstracts and 72 records of gray literature were independently screened followed by 60 that underwent full-text review.

Results

A total of three studies were included in this review, all of which found the integration of modalities to be feasible. Two studies that utilized non-conventional interventions found no significant treatment effect by combining modalities. One study demonstrated a non-significant additive effect of combining radiofrequency ablation with cognitive behavioral therapy.

Conclusions

Despite known individual benefits, there are limited studies exploring combined interventional and behavioral approaches to CLBP. Given the feasibility and the additive effects of combining interventions with behavioral therapy seen in the studies included this review, further exploration of this subject is needed to guide clinical practice.
慢性腰痛的介入治疗与行为治疗相结合的策略:范围综述
背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)常见的非手术治疗方法包括药物治疗、介入治疗和行为治疗,但目前对治疗方法尚无共识。尽管研究表明干预和行为方法单独有效,多模式治疗方法也有循证建议,但将两种方法结合使用的具体堆叠和排序策略尚未得到研究。本综述的目的是:1)探讨CLBP治疗的介入和行为方法如何堆叠或排序;2)评估介入与行为综合治疗的可行性;3)评估介入与行为治疗是否存在最佳组合。方法对介入与行为联合治疗CLBP的相关研究进行索引文献和灰色文献检索。对374篇摘要和72篇灰色文献进行独立筛选,然后对60篇进行全文审查。结果本综述共纳入3项研究,均发现综合治疗是可行的。两项采用非常规干预措施的研究发现,联合治疗效果不显著。一项研究表明,射频消融与认知行为治疗相结合的叠加效应不显著。结论:尽管已知个体获益,但探索介入和行为联合治疗CLBP的研究有限。鉴于包括本综述在内的研究中所看到的干预与行为治疗相结合的可行性和叠加效应,需要进一步探索这一主题以指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信