Investigating the influence of multitasking and gender in visuomotor skills of 1578 pilot candidates

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Frédéric R. Danion , Cécile R. Scotto , Frédéric Choisay , Lucas Debray , Alexandre Rey , Vincent Ferrandez
{"title":"Investigating the influence of multitasking and gender in visuomotor skills of 1578 pilot candidates","authors":"Frédéric R. Danion ,&nbsp;Cécile R. Scotto ,&nbsp;Frédéric Choisay ,&nbsp;Lucas Debray ,&nbsp;Alexandre Rey ,&nbsp;Vincent Ferrandez","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Because accurate eye-hand-foot coordination and the ability to simultaneously achieve several tasks are key for piloting, pilot selection typically involves dual/triple tasking in conjunction with visuomotor tests that rely on tracking a moving target with the hand and/or the feet. Because there is also a requirement to integrate more women in military jobs, here we examined the influence of gender over 1578 candidates who performed such tests during their application process for entry into the French Air and Space Force flight school. By means of a flight evaluation system, volunteers performed pursuit tracking tasks that required to move a control stick or rudder either separately (single tasking), conjointly (dual tasking), or conjointly while performing mental calculation (triple tasking). The flight simulator was designed such that maneuvering the stick (but not the rudder) dictated its inclination. Stick and rudder tracking performance were evaluated through the mean distance and lag between cursor and target. For all types of tests, the tracking scores of men outperformed those of women, especially when the flight simulator was oscillating. In contrast to stick tracking, rudder tracking suffered extensively from dual and triple tasking for all candidates. Although our findings align with other studies reporting gender differences in visuomotor tracking, they bring attention to known gender differences in the vestibular system. Moreover, under cognitive load, control of the stick is prioritized at the expense of the rudder control. This finding has practical implications for guiding assistance during delicate situations that require concurrent maneuvering of stick and rudder.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 103710"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because accurate eye-hand-foot coordination and the ability to simultaneously achieve several tasks are key for piloting, pilot selection typically involves dual/triple tasking in conjunction with visuomotor tests that rely on tracking a moving target with the hand and/or the feet. Because there is also a requirement to integrate more women in military jobs, here we examined the influence of gender over 1578 candidates who performed such tests during their application process for entry into the French Air and Space Force flight school. By means of a flight evaluation system, volunteers performed pursuit tracking tasks that required to move a control stick or rudder either separately (single tasking), conjointly (dual tasking), or conjointly while performing mental calculation (triple tasking). The flight simulator was designed such that maneuvering the stick (but not the rudder) dictated its inclination. Stick and rudder tracking performance were evaluated through the mean distance and lag between cursor and target. For all types of tests, the tracking scores of men outperformed those of women, especially when the flight simulator was oscillating. In contrast to stick tracking, rudder tracking suffered extensively from dual and triple tasking for all candidates. Although our findings align with other studies reporting gender differences in visuomotor tracking, they bring attention to known gender differences in the vestibular system. Moreover, under cognitive load, control of the stick is prioritized at the expense of the rudder control. This finding has practical implications for guiding assistance during delicate situations that require concurrent maneuvering of stick and rudder.
调查多任务和性别对 1578 名飞行员视觉运动技能的影响
因为准确的眼手脚协调和同时完成多项任务的能力是驾驶的关键,飞行员的选择通常涉及双/三重任务,并结合视觉运动测试,依赖于用手和/或脚跟踪移动目标。由于还要求让更多的妇女参加军事工作,因此,我们在这里审查了在申请进入法国航空和航天部队飞行学校的过程中进行此类测试的1578名候选人的性别影响。通过一个飞行评估系统,志愿者们执行追踪跟踪任务,这些任务需要单独移动控制杆或方向舵(单任务)、联合(双任务)或同时进行心算(三重任务)。飞行模拟器是这样设计的,操纵操纵杆(但不是方向舵)决定了它的倾斜度。通过游标与目标之间的平均距离和滞后来评价杆和舵的跟踪性能。在所有类型的测试中,男性的跟踪得分都优于女性,尤其是在飞行模拟器振荡的情况下。与操纵杆跟踪相比,方向舵跟踪在所有候选对象中都受到双重和三重任务的影响。尽管我们的研究结果与其他关于视觉运动追踪的性别差异的研究一致,但它们引起了人们对前庭系统已知性别差异的关注。此外,在认知负荷下,操纵杆的控制优先于方向舵的控制。这一发现对在需要同时操纵操纵杆和方向舵的微妙情况下的指导援助具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信