Development and application of AI assisted automatic reconstruction of axial lumbar disc CT images and diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Lidi Wan , Xiaolian Su , Zuogang Xiong , Zhijun Cui , Guangyu Tang , Haiying Zhang , Lin Zhang
{"title":"Development and application of AI assisted automatic reconstruction of axial lumbar disc CT images and diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation","authors":"Lidi Wan ,&nbsp;Xiaolian Su ,&nbsp;Zuogang Xiong ,&nbsp;Zhijun Cui ,&nbsp;Guangyu Tang ,&nbsp;Haiying Zhang ,&nbsp;Lin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rationale and Objectives.</div><div>To evaluate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted diagnostic system in reconstructing axial lumbar disc CT images and diagnosing lumbar disc herniation.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>440 patients with lumbar disc herniation were included, with 400 cases of spiral data (320 training, 40 validations, and 40 testing) and 40 cases of axial data (testing). V-Net was used to reconstruct the axial lumbar disc images. U-Net was used to segment the herniated discs and perform MSU classification. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the accuracy of AI in lumbar vertebras and discs segmentation. The quality of axial CT images reconstructed by AI and radiology technician was compared. The diagnostic accuracy of AI, radiologist, and AI + radiologist for the MSU classification of lumbar disc herniation in spiral and axial data was evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Dice coefficients of AI for segmenting the sacral, lumbar, and lumbar discs were 0.953, 0.940, and 0.926, respectively. The quality of the axial CT images reconstructed by AI and radiographer had non-significant difference (P>0.05). In both the spiral and axial data, the accuracy of AI, radiologist, and AI + radiologist in diagnosing the MSU classification was significantly different (P &lt; 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy of the AI system in MSU classification was higher in the spiral data than that of the axial data (P = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI system is feasible and satisfactory for segmentation of lumbar CT image, reconstruction of axial lumbar disc CT images, and diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 112003"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25000890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives.
To evaluate the value of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted diagnostic system in reconstructing axial lumbar disc CT images and diagnosing lumbar disc herniation.

Materials and Methods

440 patients with lumbar disc herniation were included, with 400 cases of spiral data (320 training, 40 validations, and 40 testing) and 40 cases of axial data (testing). V-Net was used to reconstruct the axial lumbar disc images. U-Net was used to segment the herniated discs and perform MSU classification. The Dice coefficient was used to evaluate the accuracy of AI in lumbar vertebras and discs segmentation. The quality of axial CT images reconstructed by AI and radiology technician was compared. The diagnostic accuracy of AI, radiologist, and AI + radiologist for the MSU classification of lumbar disc herniation in spiral and axial data was evaluated.

Results

The Dice coefficients of AI for segmenting the sacral, lumbar, and lumbar discs were 0.953, 0.940, and 0.926, respectively. The quality of the axial CT images reconstructed by AI and radiographer had non-significant difference (P>0.05). In both the spiral and axial data, the accuracy of AI, radiologist, and AI + radiologist in diagnosing the MSU classification was significantly different (P < 0.01). The diagnostic accuracy of the AI system in MSU classification was higher in the spiral data than that of the axial data (P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The AI system is feasible and satisfactory for segmentation of lumbar CT image, reconstruction of axial lumbar disc CT images, and diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信