Interventions to retain emergency department nurses: A scoping review

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Amanda Amarrador , Julia Crilly OAM , Paula Brough , Elizabeth Elder
{"title":"Interventions to retain emergency department nurses: A scoping review","authors":"Amanda Amarrador ,&nbsp;Julia Crilly OAM ,&nbsp;Paula Brough ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elder","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2025.101573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Globally, the nursing workforce is facing significant shortages, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Emergency departments (ED) are dynamic environments that expose nurses to high levels of stress. Retention of existing nurses is vital, however the efficacy of interventions to improve the retention of ED nurses is limited. This review aimed to explore the evidence surrounding interventions focussed on addressing the retention of ED nurses.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A scoping review of the literature was undertaken, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. A search of five electronic databases was conducted. Original research published between 2012 and 2023 regarding the population of nurses, the concept of interventions to decrease turnover/improve retention and the context of the emergency department were considered for inclusion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five articles met the criteria for inclusion; three evaluated educational programs to ease the transition to becoming ED nurses, two assessed locally developed ‘ad hoc’ interventions. All the transitional education programs reported an increase in retention rates, while the ad hoc interventions produced minimal to no improvement in retention or reduction of turnover intent. All studies were conducted in high-income countries.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a dearth of evidence for organisations to draw upon to increase the retention of ED nurses. Additional research is warranted, especially regarding the long-term effects of interventions aimed at improving ED nurse retention, as well as evaluating interventions implemented in a wider variety of contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101573"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X25000035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Globally, the nursing workforce is facing significant shortages, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Emergency departments (ED) are dynamic environments that expose nurses to high levels of stress. Retention of existing nurses is vital, however the efficacy of interventions to improve the retention of ED nurses is limited. This review aimed to explore the evidence surrounding interventions focussed on addressing the retention of ED nurses.

Method

A scoping review of the literature was undertaken, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. A search of five electronic databases was conducted. Original research published between 2012 and 2023 regarding the population of nurses, the concept of interventions to decrease turnover/improve retention and the context of the emergency department were considered for inclusion.

Results

Five articles met the criteria for inclusion; three evaluated educational programs to ease the transition to becoming ED nurses, two assessed locally developed ‘ad hoc’ interventions. All the transitional education programs reported an increase in retention rates, while the ad hoc interventions produced minimal to no improvement in retention or reduction of turnover intent. All studies were conducted in high-income countries.

Conclusion

There is a dearth of evidence for organisations to draw upon to increase the retention of ED nurses. Additional research is warranted, especially regarding the long-term effects of interventions aimed at improving ED nurse retention, as well as evaluating interventions implemented in a wider variety of contexts.
保留急诊科护士的干预措施:范围回顾
在全球范围内,护理人员面临严重短缺,COVID-19大流行加剧了这一问题。急诊科(ED)是一个动态的环境,使护士暴露在高水平的压力下。保留现有的护士是至关重要的,然而,干预措施的有效性,以提高保留急诊护士是有限的。本综述旨在探讨围绕解决急诊科护士保留问题的干预措施的证据。方法在乔安娜布里格斯研究所框架的指导下,对文献进行范围审查。对五个电子数据库进行了搜索。纳入考虑了2012年至2023年间发表的关于护士人口、减少离职/提高保留的干预措施概念和急诊科背景的原始研究。结果5篇文章符合纳入标准;其中三份评估了教育项目,以缓解向急诊科护士的过渡,两份评估了当地开发的“特别”干预措施。所有的过渡教育项目都报告了保留率的增加,而特别干预在保留率或减少离职意图方面几乎没有改善。所有研究均在高收入国家进行。结论缺乏证据可供组织借鉴,以提高急诊室护士的保留率。进一步的研究是有必要的,特别是关于旨在提高急诊科护士保留率的干预措施的长期影响,以及评估在更广泛的情况下实施的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care. The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信