Presenting cerebrovascular reactivity as a determinant of direct and indirect surgical revascularization success in North American patients with moyamoya vasculopathy.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shuhei Shiino, Caleb Han, Maria Garza, Matthew Fusco, Rohan Chitale, L Taylor Davis, Wesley Richerson, Mark Rodeghier, Abigail R Dubois, Melanie Leguizamon, Kilian Hett, Lori C Jordan, Manus J Donahue
{"title":"Presenting cerebrovascular reactivity as a determinant of direct and indirect surgical revascularization success in North American patients with moyamoya vasculopathy.","authors":"Shuhei Shiino, Caleb Han, Maria Garza, Matthew Fusco, Rohan Chitale, L Taylor Davis, Wesley Richerson, Mark Rodeghier, Abigail R Dubois, Melanie Leguizamon, Kilian Hett, Lori C Jordan, Manus J Donahue","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS24697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Both direct and indirect surgical revascularization techniques are commonly applied for the treatment of moyamoya disease and syndrome; however, responses can be heterogeneous and efficacy in the context of ischemic disease is not yet formally known from randomized clinical trials. Here, a prospective, longitudinal interventional study was performed to test the hypothesis that presenting 1) parenchymal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and 2) CVR response times portend hemodynamic improvements after direct and indirect revascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Catheter angiography and hypercapnic blood oxygenation-weighted 3-T MRI (spatial resolution 3.5 × 3.5 × 3.5 mm, repetition time 2000 msec) were acquired before and 11.0 ± 7.9 months and 12.6 ± 6.9 months after surgery, respectively. In response to a 5% fixed-inspired CO2 respiratory challenge, time regression analyses were utilized to quantify maximal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVRmax) and time to reach maximal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVRdelay) to test the overarching hypothesis that presurgical measures predicted postsurgical CVRmax increases and CVRdelay reductions. Age, sex, surgical type, and preoperative impairment were considered as relevant explanatory variables in the regression analysis (significance criterion p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 operative hemispheres (32 indirect-only and 15 direct or combined direct-indirect revascularization) from 30 adult patients (median [range] age 43 [20-59] years) were evaluated. Direct/combined versus indirect revascularized brain hemispheres were matched for age (44.1 ± 11.1 vs 44.7 ± 13.8 years, p = 0.864), prior infarct (92.9% vs 92.6%, p = 0.976), and Suzuki stage within 1 stage on the 6-point staging scale (4.1 ± 0.7 vs 3.4 ± 0.6). Across all hemispheres and surgical procedures, CVRmax increased (p = 0.022) and CVRdelay decreased (p = 0.009) after surgery; however, responses varied considerably across hemispheres and surgical procedures. On multiple regression analysis, extent of preoperative impairment, quantified as preoperative CVRmax and moderated by the type of surgery performed, was an indicator of intervention-induced outcome in hemodynamics (p = 0.015). No effect of preoperative CVRdelay or age was found for outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings confirm heterogeneous CVR responses approximately 1 year after revascularization across patients, albeit moderated by type of revascularization. Of the variables considered, lower presurgical CVR provided the most significant indicator of the likelihood of postsurgical hemodynamic improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS24697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Both direct and indirect surgical revascularization techniques are commonly applied for the treatment of moyamoya disease and syndrome; however, responses can be heterogeneous and efficacy in the context of ischemic disease is not yet formally known from randomized clinical trials. Here, a prospective, longitudinal interventional study was performed to test the hypothesis that presenting 1) parenchymal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and 2) CVR response times portend hemodynamic improvements after direct and indirect revascularization.

Methods: Catheter angiography and hypercapnic blood oxygenation-weighted 3-T MRI (spatial resolution 3.5 × 3.5 × 3.5 mm, repetition time 2000 msec) were acquired before and 11.0 ± 7.9 months and 12.6 ± 6.9 months after surgery, respectively. In response to a 5% fixed-inspired CO2 respiratory challenge, time regression analyses were utilized to quantify maximal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVRmax) and time to reach maximal cerebrovascular reactivity (CVRdelay) to test the overarching hypothesis that presurgical measures predicted postsurgical CVRmax increases and CVRdelay reductions. Age, sex, surgical type, and preoperative impairment were considered as relevant explanatory variables in the regression analysis (significance criterion p < 0.05).

Results: A total of 47 operative hemispheres (32 indirect-only and 15 direct or combined direct-indirect revascularization) from 30 adult patients (median [range] age 43 [20-59] years) were evaluated. Direct/combined versus indirect revascularized brain hemispheres were matched for age (44.1 ± 11.1 vs 44.7 ± 13.8 years, p = 0.864), prior infarct (92.9% vs 92.6%, p = 0.976), and Suzuki stage within 1 stage on the 6-point staging scale (4.1 ± 0.7 vs 3.4 ± 0.6). Across all hemispheres and surgical procedures, CVRmax increased (p = 0.022) and CVRdelay decreased (p = 0.009) after surgery; however, responses varied considerably across hemispheres and surgical procedures. On multiple regression analysis, extent of preoperative impairment, quantified as preoperative CVRmax and moderated by the type of surgery performed, was an indicator of intervention-induced outcome in hemodynamics (p = 0.015). No effect of preoperative CVRdelay or age was found for outcomes.

Conclusions: The findings confirm heterogeneous CVR responses approximately 1 year after revascularization across patients, albeit moderated by type of revascularization. Of the variables considered, lower presurgical CVR provided the most significant indicator of the likelihood of postsurgical hemodynamic improvement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信