The impact of alternate nostril breathing on the severity and frequency of migraine attacks: a randomized control trial.

Oğulcan Çöme, Gizim Limnili, Azize Dilek Güldal
{"title":"The impact of alternate nostril breathing on the severity and frequency of migraine attacks: a randomized control trial.","authors":"Oğulcan Çöme, Gizim Limnili, Azize Dilek Güldal","doi":"10.1017/S1463423625000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurological disorder that significantly affects quality of life. While pharmacological treatments exist, they can have limitations such as side effects, contraindications, and incomplete relief, prompting interest in non-pharmacological approaches for better symptom management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of alternate nostril breathing (ANB) as a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce the frequency and severity of migraine attacks and associated disability in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted at six Family Health Centers (FHCs) of Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. A total of 86 migraine patients aged 18-50 years, diagnosed with migraine based on ICD-10 criteria, were randomized into control (n = 43) and intervention (n = 43) groups. The intervention group practiced ANB three times daily for three months, while the control group continued their usual care. The primary outcomes were changes in migraine frequency and severity. Secondary outcomes included changes in migraine-related disability, both outcomes measured using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention group showed a significant reduction in migraine attack frequency (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and MIDAS scores (<i>P</i> = 0.003) compared to the control group. Both groups experienced a reduction in attack severity (<i>P</i> = 0.001), though no significant difference was observed between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.074). Within-group comparisons showed significant improvements in attack frequency, severity, and MIDAS scores in the intervention group (<i>P</i> = 0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANB significantly reduced migraine frequency and disability, making it a promising non-invasive and accessible treatment option for migraine management. Further research with longer follow-up periods is needed to explore its long-term effects and broader applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"26 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423625000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a prevalent and debilitating neurological disorder that significantly affects quality of life. While pharmacological treatments exist, they can have limitations such as side effects, contraindications, and incomplete relief, prompting interest in non-pharmacological approaches for better symptom management.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of alternate nostril breathing (ANB) as a non-pharmacological intervention to reduce the frequency and severity of migraine attacks and associated disability in adult patients.

Methods: A single-center, open-label, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted at six Family Health Centers (FHCs) of Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. A total of 86 migraine patients aged 18-50 years, diagnosed with migraine based on ICD-10 criteria, were randomized into control (n = 43) and intervention (n = 43) groups. The intervention group practiced ANB three times daily for three months, while the control group continued their usual care. The primary outcomes were changes in migraine frequency and severity. Secondary outcomes included changes in migraine-related disability, both outcomes measured using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS).

Results: The intervention group showed a significant reduction in migraine attack frequency (P = 0.002) and MIDAS scores (P = 0.003) compared to the control group. Both groups experienced a reduction in attack severity (P = 0.001), though no significant difference was observed between the groups (P = 0.074). Within-group comparisons showed significant improvements in attack frequency, severity, and MIDAS scores in the intervention group (P = 0.001 for all).

Conclusion: ANB significantly reduced migraine frequency and disability, making it a promising non-invasive and accessible treatment option for migraine management. Further research with longer follow-up periods is needed to explore its long-term effects and broader applicability.

交替鼻孔呼吸对偏头痛发作的严重程度和频率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:偏头痛是一种普遍和衰弱的神经系统疾病,显著影响生活质量。虽然存在药物治疗,但它们可能有副作用、禁忌症和不完全缓解等局限性,这促使人们对非药物方法更好地治疗症状产生了兴趣。目的:本研究旨在评估鼻孔交替呼吸(ANB)作为一种非药物干预措施在降低成年患者偏头痛发作频率和严重程度及相关残疾方面的有效性。方法:在土耳其伊兹密尔Dokuz Eylul大学的6个家庭健康中心(FHCs)进行单中心、开放标签、双臂、平行组随机对照试验。根据ICD-10标准诊断为偏头痛的18-50岁偏头痛患者共86例,随机分为对照组(n = 43)和干预组(n = 43)。干预组每天练习三次ANB,持续三个月,而对照组继续他们的常规护理。主要结局是偏头痛发生频率和严重程度的改变。次要结果包括偏头痛相关残疾的变化,这两个结果都使用偏头痛残疾评估量表(MIDAS)来测量。结果:干预组偏头痛发作频率(P = 0.002)和MIDAS评分(P = 0.003)明显低于对照组。两组患者的发作严重程度均有所降低(P = 0.001),但两组间无显著差异(P = 0.074)。组内比较显示干预组在发作频率、严重程度和MIDAS评分方面有显著改善(P = 0.001)。结论:ANB可显著降低偏头痛的发病率和致残性,使其成为一种有希望的无创和可获得的偏头痛治疗选择。需要进行更长的随访期的进一步研究,以探索其长期效果和更广泛的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信