Feasibility and usefulness of the elongation of ileocolic pedicle with extended ileal resection on secure anastomosis after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a retrospective observational study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tatsuya Manabe, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Takaaki Fujimoto, Futoshi Tanaka, Masafumi Nakamura, Hirokazu Noshiro
{"title":"Feasibility and usefulness of the elongation of ileocolic pedicle with extended ileal resection on secure anastomosis after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Tatsuya Manabe, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Takaaki Fujimoto, Futoshi Tanaka, Masafumi Nakamura, Hirokazu Noshiro","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03091-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tension-free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is important for avoiding anastomotic complications. We have employed the elongation of ileocolic pedicle (ICP) with extended ileal resection as one of the mesenteric-lengthening techniques. In this study, we examined the feasibility and usefulness of our mesenteric-lengthening technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients for whom laparoscopic RPC with IPAA was electively planned for UC and FAP from January 2009 to December 2022. In 41 patients (\"conventional group\"), the ileum was cut flush to the cecum without ileal resection, and in 19 patients (\"experimental group\"), the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was conducted. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the risk factor for anastomotic complications was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative and intraoperative parameters did not differ between the two groups. However, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (ARCs) was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the conventional group (0.0% versus 14.6%, respectively; p = 0.027). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was significantly correlated with ARCs (p = 0.027 and p = 0.030, respectively), although multivariate analysis did not show the independent factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lengthening technique using the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection is feasible and safe, and might be one choice for secure IPAA during the laparoscopic approach for RPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03091-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Tension-free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is important for avoiding anastomotic complications. We have employed the elongation of ileocolic pedicle (ICP) with extended ileal resection as one of the mesenteric-lengthening techniques. In this study, we examined the feasibility and usefulness of our mesenteric-lengthening technique.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients for whom laparoscopic RPC with IPAA was electively planned for UC and FAP from January 2009 to December 2022. In 41 patients ("conventional group"), the ileum was cut flush to the cecum without ileal resection, and in 19 patients ("experimental group"), the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was conducted. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the risk factor for anastomotic complications was examined.

Results: The preoperative and intraoperative parameters did not differ between the two groups. However, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (ARCs) was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the conventional group (0.0% versus 14.6%, respectively; p = 0.027). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was significantly correlated with ARCs (p = 0.027 and p = 0.030, respectively), although multivariate analysis did not show the independent factors.

Conclusion: The lengthening technique using the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection is feasible and safe, and might be one choice for secure IPAA during the laparoscopic approach for RPC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信