Finger flexor tendon injuries repaired surgically followed by an early active motion program: A prospective cohort study of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicola Williams, Madelaine Carey, Kathy Stiller
{"title":"Finger flexor tendon injuries repaired surgically followed by an early active motion program: A prospective cohort study of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Nicola Williams, Madelaine Carey, Kathy Stiller","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finger flexor tendon injuries are usually surgically repaired followed by early active motion rehabilitation. Studies have focussed on clinician-reported outcomes after these injuries.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To measure clinician- and patient-reported outcomes after finger flexor tendon repair.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with traumatic, finger flexor tendon injuries who underwent surgical repair were recruited. An individualized, early active motion rehabilitation program was provided, including an orthosis, progressive active/passive range of motion (ROM) and strengthening exercises. Clinician-reported outcomes, namely total active motion (TAM), Strickland-Glogovac ROM, flexor/extensor deficits, and grip strength, were recorded 3 months post-injury. Patient-reported outcomes, namely the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), were measured at baseline (pre-injury) and 3 months, and return to work/leisure and level of adherence at 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 32 participants (20 male, mean age 39.8 years, 61 repaired tendons) were analyzed. At 3 months post-injury, mean ROM was 83.5% and 73.8%, compared to the unaffected hand, for total active motion and Strickland-Glogovac ROM, respectively, and grip strength 68.4%. All MHQ scores were statistically significantly worse at 3 months compared to pre-injury (p ≤ 0.012), as were the physical role limitations and physical component summary scores of the SF-36 (p ≤ 0.023). All participants (100.0%) had returned to work by 3 months, and virtually all (96.6%) to leisure activities, although not always at pre-injury levels. The number of digits involved statistically significantly affected Strickland-Glogovac ROM (p ≤ 0.049), flexor deficit (p = 0.042) and SF-36 summary and total scores (p ≤ 0.049). The number of tendons involved statistically significantly affected flexor deficit (p = 0.042). Participant's adherence statistically significantly affected MHQ total score (p = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of patient-reported outcomes, in addition to clinician-reported outcomes, provided deeper insight into patients' perceptions of their recovery after flexor tendon injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Finger flexor tendon injuries are usually surgically repaired followed by early active motion rehabilitation. Studies have focussed on clinician-reported outcomes after these injuries.

Purpose: To measure clinician- and patient-reported outcomes after finger flexor tendon repair.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Methods: Adult patients with traumatic, finger flexor tendon injuries who underwent surgical repair were recruited. An individualized, early active motion rehabilitation program was provided, including an orthosis, progressive active/passive range of motion (ROM) and strengthening exercises. Clinician-reported outcomes, namely total active motion (TAM), Strickland-Glogovac ROM, flexor/extensor deficits, and grip strength, were recorded 3 months post-injury. Patient-reported outcomes, namely the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), were measured at baseline (pre-injury) and 3 months, and return to work/leisure and level of adherence at 3 months.

Results: Data from 32 participants (20 male, mean age 39.8 years, 61 repaired tendons) were analyzed. At 3 months post-injury, mean ROM was 83.5% and 73.8%, compared to the unaffected hand, for total active motion and Strickland-Glogovac ROM, respectively, and grip strength 68.4%. All MHQ scores were statistically significantly worse at 3 months compared to pre-injury (p ≤ 0.012), as were the physical role limitations and physical component summary scores of the SF-36 (p ≤ 0.023). All participants (100.0%) had returned to work by 3 months, and virtually all (96.6%) to leisure activities, although not always at pre-injury levels. The number of digits involved statistically significantly affected Strickland-Glogovac ROM (p ≤ 0.049), flexor deficit (p = 0.042) and SF-36 summary and total scores (p ≤ 0.049). The number of tendons involved statistically significantly affected flexor deficit (p = 0.042). Participant's adherence statistically significantly affected MHQ total score (p = 0.028).

Conclusions: The use of patient-reported outcomes, in addition to clinician-reported outcomes, provided deeper insight into patients' perceptions of their recovery after flexor tendon injury.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信