Impact of Otologic Surgery on Medical and Social Outcomes in Adults With Hearing Loss.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Natalie M Perlov, Marwin Li, Jena Patel, Ayan T Kumar, Zachary D Urdang, Thomas O Willcox, Rebecca C Chiffer
{"title":"Impact of Otologic Surgery on Medical and Social Outcomes in Adults With Hearing Loss.","authors":"Natalie M Perlov, Marwin Li, Jena Patel, Ayan T Kumar, Zachary D Urdang, Thomas O Willcox, Rebecca C Chiffer","doi":"10.1177/00034894251320000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypothesis that surgical otologic intervention for any type of adult hearing loss decreases the odds for incident adverse life events (ALEs) and medical comorbidities (MCBs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort database study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical record data from the TriNetX Research Network were queried for adults (age ≥18 years) with congenital, sensorineural, conductive, and mixed hearing loss (HL). Patients were further stratified into 3 groups by presence or absence (HL-surgery) of surgical intervention at any point following diagnosis, including (1) stapes surgery (HL + stapes); (2) cochlear implantation and bone-anchored hearing aid (HL + CI); and (3) mastoidectomy alone and tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy (HL + TM). Primary outcomes were defined as odds for new ALEs or MCBs at any point given HL treatment status [Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, (OR; 95% CI, <i>P</i>-value)]. Cohorts were balanced using propensity-score matching (PSM) based on US census-defined demographics and congenital comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2 577 153 patients included in this study. Matched analysis demonstrated that HL + stapes adults (n = 7985) had 0.37-lower odds (95% CI = 0.30-0.47, <i>P</i> < .0001) of experiencing any incident ALE versus HL-surgery adults (n = 2 518 409). Adults in the HL + CI cohort (n = 17 129) had 0.58-lower odds (0.52-0.66, <i>P</i> < .0001) of experiencing any incident MCB versus HL-surgery adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the benefit of surgical intervention for adult hearing loss on social and medical phenomes. These findings represent the largest cohort study to date demonstrating this association and further support that hearing restoration improves patient socioeconomic and medical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"435-443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251320000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that surgical otologic intervention for any type of adult hearing loss decreases the odds for incident adverse life events (ALEs) and medical comorbidities (MCBs).

Study design: Retrospective cohort database study.

Methods: Electronic medical record data from the TriNetX Research Network were queried for adults (age ≥18 years) with congenital, sensorineural, conductive, and mixed hearing loss (HL). Patients were further stratified into 3 groups by presence or absence (HL-surgery) of surgical intervention at any point following diagnosis, including (1) stapes surgery (HL + stapes); (2) cochlear implantation and bone-anchored hearing aid (HL + CI); and (3) mastoidectomy alone and tympanoplasty with or without mastoidectomy (HL + TM). Primary outcomes were defined as odds for new ALEs or MCBs at any point given HL treatment status [Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, (OR; 95% CI, P-value)]. Cohorts were balanced using propensity-score matching (PSM) based on US census-defined demographics and congenital comorbidities.

Results: There were 2 577 153 patients included in this study. Matched analysis demonstrated that HL + stapes adults (n = 7985) had 0.37-lower odds (95% CI = 0.30-0.47, P < .0001) of experiencing any incident ALE versus HL-surgery adults (n = 2 518 409). Adults in the HL + CI cohort (n = 17 129) had 0.58-lower odds (0.52-0.66, P < .0001) of experiencing any incident MCB versus HL-surgery adults.

Conclusions: This study highlights the benefit of surgical intervention for adult hearing loss on social and medical phenomes. These findings represent the largest cohort study to date demonstrating this association and further support that hearing restoration improves patient socioeconomic and medical outcomes.

耳科手术对成年听力损失患者医疗和社会结果的影响
目的:验证任何类型成人听力损失的外科耳科干预降低不良生活事件(ALEs)和医学合并症(mcb)发生率的假设。研究设计:回顾性队列数据库研究。方法:从TriNetX研究网络中查询先天性、感音神经性、传导性和混合性听力损失(HL)的成人(年龄≥18岁)的电子病历数据。根据诊断后任何时间是否进行过手术干预(HL-surgery),将患者进一步分为3组,包括(1)镫骨手术(HL +镫骨);(2)人工耳蜗植入+骨锚定助听器(HL + CI);(3)单纯乳突切除术和合并或不合并乳突切除术的鼓室成形术(HL + TM)。主要结局被定义为在给定HL治疗状态的任何时间点新发ALEs或mcb的几率[95%置信区间的优势比,(or;95% CI, p值)]。使用基于美国人口普查定义的人口统计学和先天性合并症的倾向得分匹配(PSM)来平衡队列。结果:共纳入2 577 153例患者。匹配分析显示HL +镫骨成人(n = 7985)的风险低0.37 (95% CI = 0.30-0.47, P P)。结论:本研究强调了成人听力损失手术干预对社会和医学现象的益处。这些发现是迄今为止最大规模的队列研究,证明了这种关联,并进一步支持听力恢复可以改善患者的社会经济和医疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信