Healthcare and Community Organizations Implementing Evidence-Based Dementia Caregiving Programs: Findings from Best Programs for Caregiving.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Rachel M Cannon, David M Bass, Sara M Powers, Morgan J Minyo, Zoe F Fete, Megan K Huth
{"title":"Healthcare and Community Organizations Implementing Evidence-Based Dementia Caregiving Programs: Findings from Best Programs for Caregiving.","authors":"Rachel M Cannon, David M Bass, Sara M Powers, Morgan J Minyo, Zoe F Fete, Megan K Huth","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>A major success in implementation science is the delivery of evidence-based dementia support programs for family/friend caregivers by service organizations. Best Programs for Caregiving (BPC) launched in 2020 as an online resource profiling 42 evidence-based programs being delivered as regular services. Data collected in 2018-2019 describes the number, characteristics, and experiences of organizations delivering BPC programs.</p><p><strong>Research and design methods: </strong>Data came from structured surveys of program developers and organizations delivering BPC programs. Descriptive analyses profile programs and organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2018-2019, 350 organizations were reported as implementing 37 BPC programs, serving an estimated 40,000 caregivers and persons living with dementia. Most delivery organizations were healthcare systems (n = 77, 23.8%), AAAs (n = 77, 23.8%), or Alzheimer's/Dementia Associations (n = 39, 12.0%). Eighteen funding sources were used to cover program-delivery costs, which most commonly were the Older Americans Act Title III E (n = 60, 34.3%) and non-ACL grants (n = 49, 28.0%). The most common challenges with delivering programs were marketing (n = 124, 69.8%) and engaging caregivers (n = 118, 66.3%), despite high satisfaction with program training and support.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>More organizations than previously known were delivering evidence-based BPC programs. Delivery experiences varied widely, with top challenges highlighting the need to increase knowledge of the availability of dementia caregiving support programs. Findings offer benchmarks for assessing the future availability and reach of evidence-based dementia caregiving programs to meet the needs of the increasing number of families caring for individuals living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: A major success in implementation science is the delivery of evidence-based dementia support programs for family/friend caregivers by service organizations. Best Programs for Caregiving (BPC) launched in 2020 as an online resource profiling 42 evidence-based programs being delivered as regular services. Data collected in 2018-2019 describes the number, characteristics, and experiences of organizations delivering BPC programs.

Research and design methods: Data came from structured surveys of program developers and organizations delivering BPC programs. Descriptive analyses profile programs and organizations.

Results: In 2018-2019, 350 organizations were reported as implementing 37 BPC programs, serving an estimated 40,000 caregivers and persons living with dementia. Most delivery organizations were healthcare systems (n = 77, 23.8%), AAAs (n = 77, 23.8%), or Alzheimer's/Dementia Associations (n = 39, 12.0%). Eighteen funding sources were used to cover program-delivery costs, which most commonly were the Older Americans Act Title III E (n = 60, 34.3%) and non-ACL grants (n = 49, 28.0%). The most common challenges with delivering programs were marketing (n = 124, 69.8%) and engaging caregivers (n = 118, 66.3%), despite high satisfaction with program training and support.

Discussion and implications: More organizations than previously known were delivering evidence-based BPC programs. Delivery experiences varied widely, with top challenges highlighting the need to increase knowledge of the availability of dementia caregiving support programs. Findings offer benchmarks for assessing the future availability and reach of evidence-based dementia caregiving programs to meet the needs of the increasing number of families caring for individuals living with dementia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信