{"title":"Test-retest reliability of the computer-based cognitive assessment tool for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: The Otassha study.","authors":"Jou-Yin Chen, Hisashi Kawai, Junta Takahashi, Manami Ejiri, Keigo Imamura, Shuichi P Obuchi","doi":"10.1177/20552076251317627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Early detection of dementia is crucial for effective intervention. The computer-based cognitive assessment tool (CompBased-CAT) was designed to assess cognitive function using a tablet computer. While its predictive validity for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is established, its test-retest reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of CompBased-CAT among older Japanese adults in a community setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a methodological study that examined the test-retest reliability of CompBased-CAT. Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older who participated in both the pre-test and post-test were included. Pre-test assessments were conducted during the 2023 Otassha study from 28 September to 8 October 2023, with the post-test administered 62 days (±14 days) later. Subtest scores were normalized to <i>z</i>-scores, and the total CompBased-CAT score was computed by summing these <i>z</i>-scores. Test-retest reliability was assessed using paired <i>t</i>-tests and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way random-effects models, with analyses stratified by age, sex, and MCI status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80 participants (mean age: 76.8 years; 27.5% male) were analyzed. Paired <i>t</i>-tests showed no significant difference in total scores between the pre-test (mean = -0.75; standard deviation [SD] = 3.73) and the post-test (mean = -0.42; SD = 4.45). The total score exhibited an ICC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-0.75) for all participants, increasing to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.48-0.88) among those with MCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CompBased-CAT demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with an ICC of 0.64 among all participants, which increased to 0.74 among participants with MCI over a 2-month period, indicating its potential for monitoring cognitive function through repeated assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251317627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251317627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Early detection of dementia is crucial for effective intervention. The computer-based cognitive assessment tool (CompBased-CAT) was designed to assess cognitive function using a tablet computer. While its predictive validity for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is established, its test-retest reliability remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of CompBased-CAT among older Japanese adults in a community setting.
Methods: This is a methodological study that examined the test-retest reliability of CompBased-CAT. Community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years or older who participated in both the pre-test and post-test were included. Pre-test assessments were conducted during the 2023 Otassha study from 28 September to 8 October 2023, with the post-test administered 62 days (±14 days) later. Subtest scores were normalized to z-scores, and the total CompBased-CAT score was computed by summing these z-scores. Test-retest reliability was assessed using paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way random-effects models, with analyses stratified by age, sex, and MCI status.
Results: A total of 80 participants (mean age: 76.8 years; 27.5% male) were analyzed. Paired t-tests showed no significant difference in total scores between the pre-test (mean = -0.75; standard deviation [SD] = 3.73) and the post-test (mean = -0.42; SD = 4.45). The total score exhibited an ICC of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49-0.75) for all participants, increasing to 0.74 (95% CI = 0.48-0.88) among those with MCI.
Conclusion: CompBased-CAT demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with an ICC of 0.64 among all participants, which increased to 0.74 among participants with MCI over a 2-month period, indicating its potential for monitoring cognitive function through repeated assessments.