Process evaluation of technologically assisted senior care using mixed methods: Results of the virtual assisted living (VAL, German: VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen) project.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241308445
Eva Jansen, Juliana Supplieth, Sonia Lech, Jan Zöllick, Johanna Schuster
{"title":"Process evaluation of technologically assisted senior care using mixed methods: Results of the virtual assisted living (VAL, German: VBW Virtuell Betreutes Wohnen) project.","authors":"Eva Jansen, Juliana Supplieth, Sonia Lech, Jan Zöllick, Johanna Schuster","doi":"10.1177/20552076241308445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Technologically assisted support systems and social support in everyday life can help senior citizens live longer independently in their homes. The purpose of this process evaluation is to investigate an innovative care model integrating monitoring technology with social support services, aimed at enabling senior citizens to live independently and extend their longevity in their homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection of this mixed-method study was conducted through three distinct sources: expert interviews with employees of the participating social service, focus groups with seniors participating in the intervention, and involved consortium partners in the project. Following Kuckartz's methodology, we employed a structural qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA software. Additionally, a portion of the standardized survey administered post-intervention to participants was analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The focus groups identified key challenges related to technical implementation such as false alarms and the failure of sensors as well as communication between invested parties. However, significant potential was noted in the practical execution of the intervention and social care. Interview participants emphasized the need for improved technical implementation. Results from the questionnaires indicate a generally positive perception of the intervention, particularly regarding its social dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surveying individuals who implement and utilize assistive technology can yield valuable insights into its effectiveness. Additionally, it is crucial to comprehensively and in detail capture the experiences of those involved in testing new care models. Future research on assistive technologies for older adults should integrate both technical and social support components, while also addressing secure data protection measures and the paradox of reassurance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076241308445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241308445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Technologically assisted support systems and social support in everyday life can help senior citizens live longer independently in their homes. The purpose of this process evaluation is to investigate an innovative care model integrating monitoring technology with social support services, aimed at enabling senior citizens to live independently and extend their longevity in their homes.

Methods: Data collection of this mixed-method study was conducted through three distinct sources: expert interviews with employees of the participating social service, focus groups with seniors participating in the intervention, and involved consortium partners in the project. Following Kuckartz's methodology, we employed a structural qualitative content analysis using MAXQDA software. Additionally, a portion of the standardized survey administered post-intervention to participants was analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: The focus groups identified key challenges related to technical implementation such as false alarms and the failure of sensors as well as communication between invested parties. However, significant potential was noted in the practical execution of the intervention and social care. Interview participants emphasized the need for improved technical implementation. Results from the questionnaires indicate a generally positive perception of the intervention, particularly regarding its social dimensions.

Conclusions: Surveying individuals who implement and utilize assistive technology can yield valuable insights into its effectiveness. Additionally, it is crucial to comprehensively and in detail capture the experiences of those involved in testing new care models. Future research on assistive technologies for older adults should integrate both technical and social support components, while also addressing secure data protection measures and the paradox of reassurance.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信