Drivers of Variation in Health Care Spending Across US Counties.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joseph L Dieleman, Maxwell Weil, Meera Beauchamp, Catherine Bisignano, Sawyer W Crosby, Drew DeJarnatt, Haley Lescinsky, Ali H Mokdad, Samuel Ostroff, Hilary Paul, Ian Pollock, Maitreyi Sahu, John W Scott, Kayla V Taylor, Azalea Thomson, Marcia R Weaver, Lauren B Wilner, Christopher J L Murray
{"title":"Drivers of Variation in Health Care Spending Across US Counties.","authors":"Joseph L Dieleman, Maxwell Weil, Meera Beauchamp, Catherine Bisignano, Sawyer W Crosby, Drew DeJarnatt, Haley Lescinsky, Ali H Mokdad, Samuel Ostroff, Hilary Paul, Ian Pollock, Maitreyi Sahu, John W Scott, Kayla V Taylor, Azalea Thomson, Marcia R Weaver, Lauren B Wilner, Christopher J L Murray","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding the drivers of health care spending across US counties is important for developing policies and assessing the allocation of health care services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the amount of cross-county health care spending variation explained by (1) population age, (2) health condition prevalence, (3) service utilization, and (4) service price and intensity.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data for 4 key drivers of per capita spending were extracted for 3110 US counties, 148 health conditions, 38 age-sex groups, 4 payers, and 7 types of care for 2019. Service utilization was measured as service volume per prevalent case, while price and intensity was measured as spending per visit, admission, or prescription. Das Gupta and Shapley decomposition methods and linear regression were used to estimate the contribution of each factor. The data analysis was conducted between March 2024 and July 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Age, disease prevalence, service utilization, or service price and intensity.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Variation in health care spending across US counties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2019, 76.6% of personal health care spending was included in this study. Overall, 64.8% of cross-county health care spending variation among 3110 US counties was explained by service utilization, while population age, disease prevalence, and price and intensity of services explained 4.1%, 7.0%, and 24.1%, respectively. The rate at which these factors contributed to variation in spending differed by payer, type of care, and health condition. Service utilization was associated with insurance coverage, median income, and education. An increase in each of these from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 7.8%, 4.4%, and 3.8% increase in ambulatory care utilization, respectively. The fraction of Medicare beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage was associated with less utilization. An increase in Medicare Advantage coverage from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 1.9% decrease in ambulatory care utilization. Differences in cross-state spending levels were also attributed to different factors. For Utah, the state with the least health care spending per capita, spending rates were lower for all types of care due principally to the young age profile. For New York, the state with the highest spending, spending rates were relatively high for hospital inpatient and prescribed pharmaceutical spending. For both types of care, high service price and intensity contributed to the above-average spending.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, variation in health care spending among US counties was largely related to variation in service utilization. Understanding the drivers of spending variation in the US may help policymakers assess the allocation of health care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245220"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the drivers of health care spending across US counties is important for developing policies and assessing the allocation of health care services.

Objective: To estimate the amount of cross-county health care spending variation explained by (1) population age, (2) health condition prevalence, (3) service utilization, and (4) service price and intensity.

Design, setting, and participants: In this cross-sectional study, data for 4 key drivers of per capita spending were extracted for 3110 US counties, 148 health conditions, 38 age-sex groups, 4 payers, and 7 types of care for 2019. Service utilization was measured as service volume per prevalent case, while price and intensity was measured as spending per visit, admission, or prescription. Das Gupta and Shapley decomposition methods and linear regression were used to estimate the contribution of each factor. The data analysis was conducted between March 2024 and July 2024.

Exposures: Age, disease prevalence, service utilization, or service price and intensity.

Main outcomes and measures: Variation in health care spending across US counties.

Results: In 2019, 76.6% of personal health care spending was included in this study. Overall, 64.8% of cross-county health care spending variation among 3110 US counties was explained by service utilization, while population age, disease prevalence, and price and intensity of services explained 4.1%, 7.0%, and 24.1%, respectively. The rate at which these factors contributed to variation in spending differed by payer, type of care, and health condition. Service utilization was associated with insurance coverage, median income, and education. An increase in each of these from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 7.8%, 4.4%, and 3.8% increase in ambulatory care utilization, respectively. The fraction of Medicare beneficiaries with Medicare Advantage was associated with less utilization. An increase in Medicare Advantage coverage from the median to the 75th percentile was associated with a 1.9% decrease in ambulatory care utilization. Differences in cross-state spending levels were also attributed to different factors. For Utah, the state with the least health care spending per capita, spending rates were lower for all types of care due principally to the young age profile. For New York, the state with the highest spending, spending rates were relatively high for hospital inpatient and prescribed pharmaceutical spending. For both types of care, high service price and intensity contributed to the above-average spending.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, variation in health care spending among US counties was largely related to variation in service utilization. Understanding the drivers of spending variation in the US may help policymakers assess the allocation of health care resources.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信