Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000907
Thomas Roe, Alex Gordon, Nicholas Gourd, Charlotte Thomas, James Ward, Chinar Osman, Ahilanandan Dushianthan
{"title":"Immunoglobulin unresponsive Guillain-Barré syndrome: rinse or repeat? A systematic review.","authors":"Thomas Roe, Alex Gordon, Nicholas Gourd, Charlotte Thomas, James Ward, Chinar Osman, Ahilanandan Dushianthan","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients may not show improvement after a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Current treatment options include either a second course of IVIg or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the use of a second course of IVIg or TPE in patients who fail to show clinical improvement after the first IVIg course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline databases up until 26 October 2023. Studies that evaluated adult patients with confirmed GBS who have failed one full course of IVIg and subsequently received either repeat IVIg or TPE were included. Risk of bias was performed using study-specific checklists. A narrative synthesis of results is presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 articles were identified (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 3 observational and 33 case reports/series), consisting of 422 patients in total. 12 studies evaluated repeat IVIg and 24 studies evaluated TPE after IVIg. There was no superiority of a repeat course of IVIg or TPE in all clinical outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence suggests with a low degree of certainty that there is no beneficial effect of further IVIg in unresponsive GBS. The quality of evidence regarding TPE after IVIg is insufficient to suggest any efficacy due to a lack of RCTs. We recommend standardised case reporting with consideration for a multinational case registry and RCTs to determine the efficacy of TPE after initial IVIg unresponsiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 1","pages":"e000907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Severe Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) patients may not show improvement after a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. Current treatment options include either a second course of IVIg or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). This systematic review aims to evaluate the current literature on the use of a second course of IVIg or TPE in patients who fail to show clinical improvement after the first IVIg course.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Medline databases up until 26 October 2023. Studies that evaluated adult patients with confirmed GBS who have failed one full course of IVIg and subsequently received either repeat IVIg or TPE were included. Risk of bias was performed using study-specific checklists. A narrative synthesis of results is presented.

Results: A total of 37 articles were identified (1 randomised controlled trial (RCT), 3 observational and 33 case reports/series), consisting of 422 patients in total. 12 studies evaluated repeat IVIg and 24 studies evaluated TPE after IVIg. There was no superiority of a repeat course of IVIg or TPE in all clinical outcome measures.

Conclusions: The evidence suggests with a low degree of certainty that there is no beneficial effect of further IVIg in unresponsive GBS. The quality of evidence regarding TPE after IVIg is insufficient to suggest any efficacy due to a lack of RCTs. We recommend standardised case reporting with consideration for a multinational case registry and RCTs to determine the efficacy of TPE after initial IVIg unresponsiveness.

免疫球蛋白无反应格林-巴罗综合征:冲洗还是重复?系统回顾。
重度吉兰-巴勒综合征(GBS)患者在单疗程静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)治疗后可能没有改善。目前的治疗方案包括第二疗程IVIg或治疗性血浆置换(TPE)。本系统综述旨在评估目前关于在第一次IVIg疗程后未显示临床改善的患者使用第二疗程IVIg或TPE的文献。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库,检索截止日期为2023年10月26日。研究评估了确诊为GBS的成人患者,这些患者在一个完整的IVIg疗程失败后,随后接受了重复IVIg或TPE。偏倚风险采用研究特定清单进行评估。提出了对结果的叙述综合。结果:共纳入37篇文献(1篇随机对照试验(RCT), 3篇观察性报告和33例病例报告/系列),共纳入422例患者。12项研究评估重复IVIg, 24项研究评估IVIg后的TPE。在所有临床结果测量中,重复IVIg或TPE疗程没有优势。结论:有证据表明,在低程度的确定性下,进一步的IVIg对无反应的GBS没有有益的影响。由于缺乏随机对照试验,关于IVIg后TPE的证据质量不足以表明任何疗效。我们建议标准化病例报告,并考虑多国病例登记和随机对照试验,以确定最初IVIg无反应后TPE的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信