Convergent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Daily Athlete Health Surveys in Collegiate Athletes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Brett S Pexa, Nikki E Barczak-Scarboro, Malia N M Blue, Christopher J Johnston, Kevin R Ford
{"title":"Convergent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of Daily Athlete Health Surveys in Collegiate Athletes.","authors":"Brett S Pexa, Nikki E Barczak-Scarboro, Malia N M Blue, Christopher J Johnston, Kevin R Ford","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Short daily surveys are common in elite sports to capture psychological outcomes, but there is no information on the surveys convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the validity and test-retest reliability of daily athlete health surveys in collegiate athletes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (n = 193, 74 males and 119 females; age = 20.3 [1.4] y) responded daily to sliding scale questions regarding readiness (scored from 0 to 100), fatigue, stress, and sleep quality (-5 [indicating low or poor scores] to +5 [indicating high or \"good\" scores]). At pre- and midseason times, participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire, Overuse Injury Scale, and the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale. To assess validity, Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between each athlete health variable and the corresponding validated survey. Reliability and precision were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Daily stress was correlated with the Perceived Stress Scale (ρ = -.40, P < .001); daily sleep quality was associated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (ρ = -.44, P < .001) and the Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire (ρ = -0.46, P < .001), and daily readiness was associated with the Overuse Injury Scale (ρ = -.21, P = .003). Daily fatigue was associated with the recovery (ρ = .37, P < .001) and stress dimensions (ρ = -.36, P < .001) of the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale. All daily athlete health variables demonstrated either good or excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .85-.94; standard error of measurement = 0.87-4.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All daily health variables demonstrated acceptable reliability and precision. Sleep quality and stress were most strongly correlated with the outcome scores of their validated surveys. Fatigue was related to the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale, and readiness demonstrated a weak correlation to the Overuse Injury Scale. Clinicians should feel comfortable using these single-question daily health surveys in clinical care but exert caution when using readiness, and fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Short daily surveys are common in elite sports to capture psychological outcomes, but there is no information on the surveys convergent validity and test-retest reliability. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the validity and test-retest reliability of daily athlete health surveys in collegiate athletes.

Design: Descriptive study.

Methods: Participants (n = 193, 74 males and 119 females; age = 20.3 [1.4] y) responded daily to sliding scale questions regarding readiness (scored from 0 to 100), fatigue, stress, and sleep quality (-5 [indicating low or poor scores] to +5 [indicating high or "good" scores]). At pre- and midseason times, participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire, Overuse Injury Scale, and the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale. To assess validity, Spearman rho (ρ) correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between each athlete health variable and the corresponding validated survey. Reliability and precision were assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement, respectively.

Results: Daily stress was correlated with the Perceived Stress Scale (ρ = -.40, P < .001); daily sleep quality was associated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (ρ = -.44, P < .001) and the Athlete Sleep Screening Questionnaire (ρ = -0.46, P < .001), and daily readiness was associated with the Overuse Injury Scale (ρ = -.21, P = .003). Daily fatigue was associated with the recovery (ρ = .37, P < .001) and stress dimensions (ρ = -.36, P < .001) of the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale. All daily athlete health variables demonstrated either good or excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .85-.94; standard error of measurement = 0.87-4.94).

Conclusions: All daily health variables demonstrated acceptable reliability and precision. Sleep quality and stress were most strongly correlated with the outcome scores of their validated surveys. Fatigue was related to the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale, and readiness demonstrated a weak correlation to the Overuse Injury Scale. Clinicians should feel comfortable using these single-question daily health surveys in clinical care but exert caution when using readiness, and fatigue.

大学生运动员日常健康调查的收敛效度和重测信度。
背景:短期的日常调查在精英体育中很常见,以捕捉心理结果,但没有关于调查的收敛效度和重测信度的信息。因此,本研究的目的是确定大学生运动员日常健康调查的效度和重测信度。设计:描述性研究。方法:研究对象193例,其中男性74例,女性119例;年龄= 20.3[1.4]岁)每天回答关于准备程度(从0到100分)、疲劳、压力和睡眠质量(-5[表示低或差的分数]到+5[表示高或“好”的分数])的滑动量表问题。在赛季前和赛季中期,参与者完成了感知压力量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、运动员睡眠筛选问卷、过度使用损伤量表和急性恢复和压力量表。为评估效度,采用Spearman (ρ)相关系数评估每个运动员健康变量与相应的验证调查之间的关系。分别用类内相关系数和计量标准误差评价方法的信度和精密度。结果:日常应激与感知应激量表相关(ρ = -)。40, p < .001);每日睡眠质量与匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(ρ = -)相关。44, P < .001)和运动员睡眠筛选问卷(ρ = -0.46, P < .001),每日准备状态与过度使用损伤量表(ρ = -)相关。21, p = .003)。每日疲劳与恢复(ρ = .37, P < .001)和应力维度(ρ = -)相关。36, P < 0.001)。所有运动员日常健康变量均表现出良好或极好的信度(类内相关系数= 0.85 - 0.94;测量标准误差= 0.87-4.94)。结论:所有日常健康变量均具有可接受的可靠性和精密度。睡眠质量和压力与经过验证的调查结果得分的关系最为密切。疲劳与急性恢复和压力量表相关,准备程度与过度使用损伤量表弱相关。临床医生在临床护理中使用这些单一问题的日常健康调查应该感到舒适,但在使用准备和疲劳时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信