Disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris among university students - A cross-sectional study.

Q3 Nursing
Malaysian Family Physician Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.51866/oa.622
Yi Jun Tan, Adawiyah Jamil, Preamala Gunabalasingam
{"title":"Disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris among university students - A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yi Jun Tan, Adawiyah Jamil, Preamala Gunabalasingam","doi":"10.51866/oa.622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acne is a common chronic inflammatory disease. Misconceptions hinder effective management. This study aimed to explore disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and the psychosocial impact of acne.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in four universities. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and validated. During clinical examination, acne severity was determined using the Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale (CASS) and psychosocial impact using the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred students with acne aged 20±1.62 years participated, among whom 62.5% were women. The self-perceived acne severity matched the CASS score in 54.4% of the participants but was worse in 37.5%. Approximately 80.5% correctly recognised acne as a disease, while beliefs about its chronicity varied. The aggravating factors were food (92.8%), genetic predisposition (92.8%), stress (91.3%), hygiene (86.3%) and menstruation (84.8%). The information sources were families (79.7%), online social media platforms (60.2%) and friends (58.5%). Doctor consultation was significantly associated with correct disease perception, severe disease and higher psychosocial impact. Cost was the commonest deterrent for seeking (63.8%) and discontinuing treatment (43.2%). The psychosocial impact was predominantly mild (71%). The CADI domains mostly affected were feelings and psychological state. The clinical (odd ratio [OR] =2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45, 3.61) and self-perceived acne severity (OR=4.83, 95% CI=2.79, 8.35) predicted a higher psychosocial impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Misconceptions about acne as a disease were not prevalent, and aggravating factors other than food were correctly identified. Common information sources may further perpetuate misconceptions. Financial treatment barriers should be addressed especially in patients with severe acne and psychosocial impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":40017,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Family Physician","volume":"20 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Family Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51866/oa.622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acne is a common chronic inflammatory disease. Misconceptions hinder effective management. This study aimed to explore disease perception, treatment-seeking behaviour and the psychosocial impact of acne.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in four universities. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and validated. During clinical examination, acne severity was determined using the Comprehensive Acne Severity Scale (CASS) and psychosocial impact using the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).

Results: Four hundred students with acne aged 20±1.62 years participated, among whom 62.5% were women. The self-perceived acne severity matched the CASS score in 54.4% of the participants but was worse in 37.5%. Approximately 80.5% correctly recognised acne as a disease, while beliefs about its chronicity varied. The aggravating factors were food (92.8%), genetic predisposition (92.8%), stress (91.3%), hygiene (86.3%) and menstruation (84.8%). The information sources were families (79.7%), online social media platforms (60.2%) and friends (58.5%). Doctor consultation was significantly associated with correct disease perception, severe disease and higher psychosocial impact. Cost was the commonest deterrent for seeking (63.8%) and discontinuing treatment (43.2%). The psychosocial impact was predominantly mild (71%). The CADI domains mostly affected were feelings and psychological state. The clinical (odd ratio [OR] =2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45, 3.61) and self-perceived acne severity (OR=4.83, 95% CI=2.79, 8.35) predicted a higher psychosocial impact.

Conclusion: Misconceptions about acne as a disease were not prevalent, and aggravating factors other than food were correctly identified. Common information sources may further perpetuate misconceptions. Financial treatment barriers should be addressed especially in patients with severe acne and psychosocial impacts.

大学生痤疮的疾病认知、求医行为和心理社会影响——一项横断面研究。
痤疮是一种常见的慢性炎症性疾病。误解阻碍了有效的管理。本研究旨在探讨痤疮的疾病认知、寻求治疗行为和心理社会影响。方法:在四所高校进行横断面研究。开发并验证了一份自我管理的问卷。在临床检查中,使用综合痤疮严重程度量表(CASS)确定痤疮严重程度,使用卡迪夫痤疮残疾指数(CADI)确定心理社会影响。结果:400名痤疮学生参与调查,年龄20±1.62岁,其中女性占62.5%。54.4%的参与者自我感知的痤疮严重程度与CASS评分相符,但37.5%的参与者更差。大约80.5%的人正确地认识到痤疮是一种疾病,而对其慢性的看法则各不相同。加重因素依次为食物(92.8%)、遗传易感性(92.8%)、压力(91.3%)、卫生(86.3%)和月经(84.8%)。信息来源主要为家庭(79.7%)、网络社交平台(60.2%)和朋友(58.5%)。医生咨询与正确的疾病认知、严重的疾病和较高的社会心理影响显著相关。费用是寻求治疗(63.8%)和停止治疗(43.2%)最常见的障碍。心理社会影响主要是轻微的(71%)。受影响最大的是感觉和心理状态。临床(奇比[OR] =2.29, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.45, 3.61)和自我感知痤疮严重程度(OR=4.83, 95% CI=2.79, 8.35)预测更高的心理社会影响。结论:痤疮作为一种疾病的误解并不普遍,并正确识别了除食物外的加重因素。共同的信息来源可能进一步使误解永久化。财政治疗障碍应解决,特别是在患者严重痤疮和心理社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Family Physician
Malaysian Family Physician Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Family Physician is the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. It is published three times a year. Circulation: The journal is distributed free of charge to all members of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia. Complimentary copies are also sent to other organizations that are members of the World Organization of Family Doctors (WONCA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信