Academic Coaching to Promote Self-Directed Learning in Graduate Medical Education.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kathryn M Burtson, Kelsey R Wilson, Michelle E Kiger, Eulho Jung, Joshua D Hartzell, Holly Meyer
{"title":"Academic Coaching to Promote Self-Directed Learning in Graduate Medical Education.","authors":"Kathryn M Burtson, Kelsey R Wilson, Michelle E Kiger, Eulho Jung, Joshua D Hartzell, Holly Meyer","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09424-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduate medical education is a critical period for fostering self-directed learning (SDL). This study introduced an academic coaching program to support SDL among internal medicine (IM) residents, leveraging Gallimore and Tharp's four-stage model as a scaffolding framework.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of academic coaching on residents' performance, including Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores, individualized learning plans (ILPs), and attitudinal changes. The study also explored how coaching influenced SDL within the residency program.</p><p><strong>Design and participants: </strong>A mixed-methods case study was conducted in a mid-sized university's IM residency program. Quantitative measures included pre- and post-coaching surveys, ILP analysis, and IM-ITE score evaluation. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into participant experiences. Of 77 eligible residents, 40 enrolled in the coaching program, and 27 (18 post-graduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY2) completed at least one session. Baseline IM-ITE scores guided enrollment for mandatory participants.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of the 77 residents, 51 had complete IM-ITE data and individualized learning plans (ILPs) from 2022 and 2023. Residents attending one coaching session demonstrated significant improvement in IM-ITE percentile scores (p = .022), while those with two or more sessions showed significant gains in both percent correct (p = .015) and percentile scores (p = .003). No significant differences were observed in ILPs or attitudinal surveys. Qualitative analyses of resident participant interviews highlight coaching's positive influence on SDL, organized into input, process, and output domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sustained coaching, defined as two or more coaching meetings, is associated with improved IM-ITE performance. Qualitative findings underscore the program's role in enhancing residents' SDL.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09424-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Graduate medical education is a critical period for fostering self-directed learning (SDL). This study introduced an academic coaching program to support SDL among internal medicine (IM) residents, leveraging Gallimore and Tharp's four-stage model as a scaffolding framework.

Objective: To assess the impact of academic coaching on residents' performance, including Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores, individualized learning plans (ILPs), and attitudinal changes. The study also explored how coaching influenced SDL within the residency program.

Design and participants: A mixed-methods case study was conducted in a mid-sized university's IM residency program. Quantitative measures included pre- and post-coaching surveys, ILP analysis, and IM-ITE score evaluation. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights into participant experiences. Of 77 eligible residents, 40 enrolled in the coaching program, and 27 (18 post-graduate year (PGY) 1 and PGY2) completed at least one session. Baseline IM-ITE scores guided enrollment for mandatory participants.

Key results: Of the 77 residents, 51 had complete IM-ITE data and individualized learning plans (ILPs) from 2022 and 2023. Residents attending one coaching session demonstrated significant improvement in IM-ITE percentile scores (p = .022), while those with two or more sessions showed significant gains in both percent correct (p = .015) and percentile scores (p = .003). No significant differences were observed in ILPs or attitudinal surveys. Qualitative analyses of resident participant interviews highlight coaching's positive influence on SDL, organized into input, process, and output domains.

Conclusions: Sustained coaching, defined as two or more coaching meetings, is associated with improved IM-ITE performance. Qualitative findings underscore the program's role in enhancing residents' SDL.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信