Nithin S Ravi, Rakesh D Mistry, Jonathan Orsborn, Mairead Dillon, Jeffrey Tutman, Kari Hayes, Carmelle Wallace, Jeremiah T Lowe, Tien Vu
{"title":"Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastrostomy Balloon Placement.","authors":"Nithin S Ravi, Rakesh D Mistry, Jonathan Orsborn, Mairead Dillon, Jeffrey Tutman, Kari Hayes, Carmelle Wallace, Jeremiah T Lowe, Tien Vu","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy is the gold standard for evaluation of gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, though it is costly and resource-intensive. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has potential as a low-risk alternative to confirm GT placement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for identification of correct gastrostomy balloon placement as compared to fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective convenience sample of children presenting to interventional radiology for routine GT or gastrojejunal (GJ) tube exchange. Prior to exchange, POCUS operators scanned and interpreted ultrasound images for GT placement, followed by fluoroscopy. A blinded radiologist interpreted fluoroscopic studies. Diagnostic test characteristics, concordance with 95% confidence intervals, and interrater agreement (Cohen's Kappa) between POCUS and fluoroscopy were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four (3%) of 118 evaluated GT balloons were displaced. Compared to fluoroscopy, novice POCUS assessment of GT/GJ balloon placement had a sensitivity of 87% (79%-92%), specificity of 25% (1%-81%), PPV of 97% (92%-99%), NPV of 6% (1%-30%), proportion agreement of 85%, (77%-91%) kappa 0.04. Expert POCUS interpretation exhibited sensitivity of 91% (84%, 96%), proportion agreement of 89% (82%-94%), kappa 0.09. pH testing had the highest sensitivity of 93% (85%, 97%), proportion of agreement 92% (84%-97%) and kappa 0.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS demonstrated a high sensitivity and concordance for GT/GJ balloon placement, with low interrater agreement with fluoroscopy. POCUS may not add additional clinical benefit in routine evaluation of GTs over current standards of care. However, POCUS may serve as a useful screening test in settings where fluoroscopy is unavailable or pH is unobtainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.09.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fluoroscopy is the gold standard for evaluation of gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, though it is costly and resource-intensive. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has potential as a low-risk alternative to confirm GT placement.
Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for identification of correct gastrostomy balloon placement as compared to fluoroscopy.
Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of children presenting to interventional radiology for routine GT or gastrojejunal (GJ) tube exchange. Prior to exchange, POCUS operators scanned and interpreted ultrasound images for GT placement, followed by fluoroscopy. A blinded radiologist interpreted fluoroscopic studies. Diagnostic test characteristics, concordance with 95% confidence intervals, and interrater agreement (Cohen's Kappa) between POCUS and fluoroscopy were calculated.
Results: Four (3%) of 118 evaluated GT balloons were displaced. Compared to fluoroscopy, novice POCUS assessment of GT/GJ balloon placement had a sensitivity of 87% (79%-92%), specificity of 25% (1%-81%), PPV of 97% (92%-99%), NPV of 6% (1%-30%), proportion agreement of 85%, (77%-91%) kappa 0.04. Expert POCUS interpretation exhibited sensitivity of 91% (84%, 96%), proportion agreement of 89% (82%-94%), kappa 0.09. pH testing had the highest sensitivity of 93% (85%, 97%), proportion of agreement 92% (84%-97%) and kappa 0.19.
Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated a high sensitivity and concordance for GT/GJ balloon placement, with low interrater agreement with fluoroscopy. POCUS may not add additional clinical benefit in routine evaluation of GTs over current standards of care. However, POCUS may serve as a useful screening test in settings where fluoroscopy is unavailable or pH is unobtainable.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine