Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastrostomy Balloon Placement.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nithin S Ravi, Rakesh D Mistry, Jonathan Orsborn, Mairead Dillon, Jeffrey Tutman, Kari Hayes, Carmelle Wallace, Jeremiah T Lowe, Tien Vu
{"title":"Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Assess Gastrostomy Balloon Placement.","authors":"Nithin S Ravi, Rakesh D Mistry, Jonathan Orsborn, Mairead Dillon, Jeffrey Tutman, Kari Hayes, Carmelle Wallace, Jeremiah T Lowe, Tien Vu","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy is the gold standard for evaluation of gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, though it is costly and resource-intensive. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has potential as a low-risk alternative to confirm GT placement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for identification of correct gastrostomy balloon placement as compared to fluoroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective convenience sample of children presenting to interventional radiology for routine GT or gastrojejunal (GJ) tube exchange. Prior to exchange, POCUS operators scanned and interpreted ultrasound images for GT placement, followed by fluoroscopy. A blinded radiologist interpreted fluoroscopic studies. Diagnostic test characteristics, concordance with 95% confidence intervals, and interrater agreement (Cohen's Kappa) between POCUS and fluoroscopy were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four (3%) of 118 evaluated GT balloons were displaced. Compared to fluoroscopy, novice POCUS assessment of GT/GJ balloon placement had a sensitivity of 87% (79%-92%), specificity of 25% (1%-81%), PPV of 97% (92%-99%), NPV of 6% (1%-30%), proportion agreement of 85%, (77%-91%) kappa 0.04. Expert POCUS interpretation exhibited sensitivity of 91% (84%, 96%), proportion agreement of 89% (82%-94%), kappa 0.09. pH testing had the highest sensitivity of 93% (85%, 97%), proportion of agreement 92% (84%-97%) and kappa 0.19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS demonstrated a high sensitivity and concordance for GT/GJ balloon placement, with low interrater agreement with fluoroscopy. POCUS may not add additional clinical benefit in routine evaluation of GTs over current standards of care. However, POCUS may serve as a useful screening test in settings where fluoroscopy is unavailable or pH is unobtainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.09.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluoroscopy is the gold standard for evaluation of gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, though it is costly and resource-intensive. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has potential as a low-risk alternative to confirm GT placement.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS for identification of correct gastrostomy balloon placement as compared to fluoroscopy.

Methods: This was a prospective convenience sample of children presenting to interventional radiology for routine GT or gastrojejunal (GJ) tube exchange. Prior to exchange, POCUS operators scanned and interpreted ultrasound images for GT placement, followed by fluoroscopy. A blinded radiologist interpreted fluoroscopic studies. Diagnostic test characteristics, concordance with 95% confidence intervals, and interrater agreement (Cohen's Kappa) between POCUS and fluoroscopy were calculated.

Results: Four (3%) of 118 evaluated GT balloons were displaced. Compared to fluoroscopy, novice POCUS assessment of GT/GJ balloon placement had a sensitivity of 87% (79%-92%), specificity of 25% (1%-81%), PPV of 97% (92%-99%), NPV of 6% (1%-30%), proportion agreement of 85%, (77%-91%) kappa 0.04. Expert POCUS interpretation exhibited sensitivity of 91% (84%, 96%), proportion agreement of 89% (82%-94%), kappa 0.09. pH testing had the highest sensitivity of 93% (85%, 97%), proportion of agreement 92% (84%-97%) and kappa 0.19.

Conclusion: POCUS demonstrated a high sensitivity and concordance for GT/GJ balloon placement, with low interrater agreement with fluoroscopy. POCUS may not add additional clinical benefit in routine evaluation of GTs over current standards of care. However, POCUS may serve as a useful screening test in settings where fluoroscopy is unavailable or pH is unobtainable.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信