Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Troy S Karanfilian, Tobin Thuma, Tiffany Cheng, Ricky Paramo, Jee-Young Moon, Sruti Akella, Anne Barmettler
{"title":"Efficacy of Silicone Gel Versus Placebo for Postsurgical Scars of the Eyelids: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Study.","authors":"Troy S Karanfilian, Tobin Thuma, Tiffany Cheng, Ricky Paramo, Jee-Young Moon, Sruti Akella, Anne Barmettler","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: While silicone has been shown to be effective on scars on the sternum, foot, and other areas with thicker skin, the effect of silicone on scars in the thin periocular skin has not yet been evaluated in a prospective, randomized, and double-blinded fashion.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty or bilateral upper eyelid ptosis repair. Subjects were randomized to apply silicone gel to 1 eyelid incision site and placebo (petrolatum ointment) to the other side twice daily postoperatively. Outcome measures were physician-graded scar erythema, elevation, and pigmentation, as well as patient-reported satisfaction, itching, pain, and firmness. These were assessed postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Results: Of 192 eyelids from 96 patients, there were no significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences in any outcomes between silicone gel and placebo across any measure or time point. Patient satisfaction and blinded doctor and patient appearance preferences did not show any significant difference between the 2 treatments at any time point. Average follow-up was 11 weeks (range: 1-136 weeks).

Discussion: This clinical trial suggests that topical silicone may not offer significant advantages over petrolatum ointment in improving eyelid scar healing. Overall results indicate similar efficacy between treatments. These results underscore the importance of evidence-based medicine in choosing beneficial and cost-effective interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信