Colleen Judge-Golden, Sydney Sheffield, Lucero Hernandez, Norma Davis, Rebecca Fairchild, Jonas J Swartz
{"title":"Patient Preferences for Provider Specialization for Induced Abortion and Miscarriage Care.","authors":"Colleen Judge-Golden, Sydney Sheffield, Lucero Hernandez, Norma Davis, Rebecca Fairchild, Jonas J Swartz","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Most induced abortions are provided by abortion specialists, despite knowledge and skills overlap with other disciplines, particularly general obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN). We evaluated patient preferences for abortion and miscarriage care from a family planning specialist versus other providers, and perceptions of a general OB/GYN's ability to provide safe miscarriage and abortion care. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We conducted a cross-sectional survey among individuals aged 18-44 receiving induced abortion (<i>n</i> = 54) or nonabortion gynecological care (<i>n</i> = 111) in North Carolina hospital-based gynecology or family planning clinics between April and October 2023. The primary predictor was appointment type. The primary outcome was preference for induced abortion from a family planning specialist versus other providers; secondary outcomes were provider specialty preference for miscarriage care and patient perceptions of a general OB/GYN's scope of practice. We evaluated associations between appointment type, outcomes, and participant characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> This was a racially diverse population with half (50.3%) using public health insurance. Most (73.0%) felt abortion is \"morally acceptable and should be legal.\" Over half (53.1%) preferred induced abortion from a specialist provider, compared with one-third (32.7%) for miscarriage (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no differences by appointment type. Educational attainment (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and Democratic party affiliation (<i>p</i> = 0.02) were independently associated with abortion specialist preference, but not significant in multivariable analysis. More participants believed a general OB/GYN can provide medications for miscarriage management compared with induced abortion (94.5% versus 86.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Both medical and surgical first trimester induced abortions were more often identified as within-scope for a general OB/GYN than the ability to perform a hysterectomy (69.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Most (78.8%) believed OB/GYNs should be required to train in abortion care. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Participants were more likely to prefer a family planning specialist for induced abortion care versus miscarriage; however, nearly half preferred nonspecialist care. Incorporation of induced abortion into general practice settings may meet patient preferences while expanding access.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Most induced abortions are provided by abortion specialists, despite knowledge and skills overlap with other disciplines, particularly general obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN). We evaluated patient preferences for abortion and miscarriage care from a family planning specialist versus other providers, and perceptions of a general OB/GYN's ability to provide safe miscarriage and abortion care. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among individuals aged 18-44 receiving induced abortion (n = 54) or nonabortion gynecological care (n = 111) in North Carolina hospital-based gynecology or family planning clinics between April and October 2023. The primary predictor was appointment type. The primary outcome was preference for induced abortion from a family planning specialist versus other providers; secondary outcomes were provider specialty preference for miscarriage care and patient perceptions of a general OB/GYN's scope of practice. We evaluated associations between appointment type, outcomes, and participant characteristics. Results: This was a racially diverse population with half (50.3%) using public health insurance. Most (73.0%) felt abortion is "morally acceptable and should be legal." Over half (53.1%) preferred induced abortion from a specialist provider, compared with one-third (32.7%) for miscarriage (p < 0.001), with no differences by appointment type. Educational attainment (p = 0.03) and Democratic party affiliation (p = 0.02) were independently associated with abortion specialist preference, but not significant in multivariable analysis. More participants believed a general OB/GYN can provide medications for miscarriage management compared with induced abortion (94.5% versus 86.6%, p = 0.01). Both medical and surgical first trimester induced abortions were more often identified as within-scope for a general OB/GYN than the ability to perform a hysterectomy (69.8%, p < 0.01). Most (78.8%) believed OB/GYNs should be required to train in abortion care. Conclusions: Participants were more likely to prefer a family planning specialist for induced abortion care versus miscarriage; however, nearly half preferred nonspecialist care. Incorporation of induced abortion into general practice settings may meet patient preferences while expanding access.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment.
Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes:
-Internal Medicine
Endocrinology-
Cardiology-
Oncology-
Obstetrics/Gynecology-
Urogynecology-
Psychiatry-
Neurology-
Nutrition-
Sex-Based Biology-
Complementary Medicine-
Sports Medicine-
Surgery-
Medical Education-
Public Policy.