Comparative outcomes of arteriovenous malformations treatment in eloquent versus non-eloquent brain: A multicenter study with propensity-score weighting.

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
International Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/17474930251323503
Basel Musmar, Nimer Adeeb, Hammam Abdalrazeq, Hamza Adel Salim, Joanna M Roy, Assala Aslan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Christopher S Ogilvy, Mustafa K Baskaya, Douglas Kondziolka, Jason Sheehan, Howard Riina, Sandeep Kandregula, Adam A Dmytriw, Abdallah Abushehab, Kareem El Naamani, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Natasha Ironside, Deepak Kumbhare, Sanjeev Gummadi, Cagdas Ataoglu, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Abdullah Keles, Sandeep Muram, Daniel Sconzo, Arwin Rezai, Omar Alwakaa, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Min S Park, Sahin Hanalioglu, Ufuk Erginoglu, Johannes Pöppe, Rajeev D Sen, Christoph J Griessenauer, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Robert M Starke, Laligam N Sekhar, Michael R Levitt, David J Altschul, Neil Haranhalli, Malia McAvoy, Hussein A Zeineddine, Adib A Abla, Elias Atallah, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Christopher Stapleton, Matthew Koch, Visish M Srinivasan, Peng R Chen, Spiros Blackburn, Ketan Bulsara, Louis J Kim, Omar Choudhri, Bryan Pukenas, Edward Smith, Pascal J Mosimann, Ali Alaraj, Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan, Aman B Patel, Amey Savardekar, Christina Notarianni, Hugo H Cuellar, Michael Lawton, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of arteriovenous malformations treatment in eloquent versus non-eloquent brain: A multicenter study with propensity-score weighting.","authors":"Basel Musmar, Nimer Adeeb, Hammam Abdalrazeq, Hamza Adel Salim, Joanna M Roy, Assala Aslan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Christopher S Ogilvy, Mustafa K Baskaya, Douglas Kondziolka, Jason Sheehan, Howard Riina, Sandeep Kandregula, Adam A Dmytriw, Abdallah Abushehab, Kareem El Naamani, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Natasha Ironside, Deepak Kumbhare, Sanjeev Gummadi, Cagdas Ataoglu, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Abdullah Keles, Sandeep Muram, Daniel Sconzo, Arwin Rezai, Omar Alwakaa, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Min S Park, Sahin Hanalioglu, Ufuk Erginoglu, Johannes Pöppe, Rajeev D Sen, Christoph J Griessenauer, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Robert M Starke, Laligam N Sekhar, Michael R Levitt, David J Altschul, Neil Haranhalli, Malia McAvoy, Hussein A Zeineddine, Adib A Abla, Elias Atallah, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Christopher Stapleton, Matthew Koch, Visish M Srinivasan, Peng R Chen, Spiros Blackburn, Ketan Bulsara, Louis J Kim, Omar Choudhri, Bryan Pukenas, Edward Smith, Pascal J Mosimann, Ali Alaraj, Mohammad A Aziz-Sultan, Aman B Patel, Amey Savardekar, Christina Notarianni, Hugo H Cuellar, Michael Lawton, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1177/17474930251323503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"852-863"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251323503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables.

Results: The study included 1013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery.

Conclusion: AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.

能言善辩脑与非能言善辩脑动静脉畸形治疗的比较结果:一项倾向评分加权的多中心研究。
背景:动静脉畸形(AVMs)是一种复杂的血管异常,具有出血和神经功能障碍的高风险,特别是当位于大脑的流利区域时。在治疗计划中,AVM的位置是一个关键因素,影响并发症的风险和长期的功能结果。本研究旨在比较雄辩型和非雄辩型avm的结果。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究利用了多中心国际脑动静脉畸形治疗研究(MISTA)联盟的数据。使用改进的Rankin量表(mRS)比较雄辩型和非雄辩型avm患者的基线特征、血管造影结果和功能结果。倾向得分加权(IPTW)用于调整混杂变量。结果:本研究纳入1013例患者,其中498例(49.2%)avm位于雄辩区,515例(50.8%)位于非雄辩区。在未经调整的分析中,与非雄辩型avm相比,雄辩型avm的完全闭塞率较低(67.6%对79.5%,OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001),并发症发生率较高(24.5%对19.0%,OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03)。调整IPTW后,雄辩型avm的总并发症发生率(OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01)和症状性并发症发生率(OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01)继续显著升高。在雄辩组的二次分析表明,栓塞与并发症的风险增加有关。手术和放射手术在最后随访时显示出相当的功能结局和并发症发生率,手术的完全闭塞率更高。结论:脑区动静脉畸形并发症风险高,闭塞率低,需要谨慎、个体化的治疗方案。在雄辩组中,栓塞增加了并发症的风险,而手术和放射手术在最后随访时显示出相当的功能结果和并发症发生率,手术完全闭塞率更高。这些发现强调了位置在动静脉畸形治疗中的重要性,并支持了进一步的研究,重点是比较雄辩脑区动静脉畸形的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信