Safety issues of donepezil combined with memantine in Alzheimer's disease population: real-world pharmacovigilance.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai
{"title":"Safety issues of donepezil combined with memantine in Alzheimer's disease population: real-world pharmacovigilance.","authors":"Yi Zeng, Bingshuo Liu, Lisi Zhou, Wenling Zeng, Xiaona Tian, Jiazhen Jiang, Dandan Dai","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. The combination of Donepezil and Memantine is the only FDA-approved therapy for AD, but its adverse drug reactions (ADRs) lack systematic analysis. This study carried out drug combination analysis for AD population to provide evidence support for clinical safety of drug use.

Research design and methods: Using FAERS database reports (January 2004-January 2024) with Donepezil and Memantine as primary suspected drugs, four disproportionality analysis methods - ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM - were applied to identify positive ADR signals. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and gender.

Results: A total of 712 reports were analyzed (54.6% female, 55.1% aged 65-85). Across the AD population, 42 ADRs were identified, including hypertensive crisis, hyperglycemia, hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome, proteinuria, and hydronephrosis, many of which were newly reported. Subgroup analysis revealed prostate hypertrophy, acute kidney injury, and cerebral infarction in males, while females experienced more severe cardiovascular events, such as complete AV block and ventricular extrasystole. Additional ADRs included hyperkalemia, sinus bradycardia, and extrapyramidal disorders.

Conclusions: Despite partial consistency of combined ADRs for Donepezil and Memantine with instructions, new ADR signals emerged, with significant differences in AD subgroups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信