Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Thomas Ganty, Julien Szecel, Anh Diep, Alexandre Ghuysen, Méryl Paquay
{"title":"Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments.","authors":"Thomas Ganty, Julien Szecel, Anh Diep, Alexandre Ghuysen, Méryl Paquay","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive workload in emergency departments (ED) negatively affects patient safety, often leading to missed critical tasks due to time constraints. The Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) scale developed in Belgium offers a detailed measurement of nursing workload, but its complexity makes it hard to use in practice. Our study aims to find a simpler method for assessing nursing workload in EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in four Belgian EDs between September 2022 and March 2023. Nursing workload was assessed using the WANE scale in each hospital, during 4-hour time periods. The associations between WANE scores, and nurses' subjective workload assessment, number of patients, patient triage levels, post-triage destination area and the Jones Dependency Tool Score were examined employing multiple linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>161 nurses, caring for 591 patients, were included. 67% of the variation in 'direct' care time could be explained with a model based on triage level and two items of the Jones Dependency Tool (ABC perturbation and mobility). The number of new patients admitted and nurses' perceived workload were also highly associated with the total nursing care time TNCT. The actual number of patients in the ED at any time explained 78% of the variation in TNCT. Each additional patient increases the TNTC by 45.22 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simple indicators might be used to evaluate the nursing care time in Belgian EDs. A retrospective method is suggested, using the total number of patients over a defined period of time. This study reveals a path to a predictive method to calculate the direct care time for each patient with three simple indicators, available from nursing triage stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"421-428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12229054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive workload in emergency departments (ED) negatively affects patient safety, often leading to missed critical tasks due to time constraints. The Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) scale developed in Belgium offers a detailed measurement of nursing workload, but its complexity makes it hard to use in practice. Our study aims to find a simpler method for assessing nursing workload in EDs.

Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in four Belgian EDs between September 2022 and March 2023. Nursing workload was assessed using the WANE scale in each hospital, during 4-hour time periods. The associations between WANE scores, and nurses' subjective workload assessment, number of patients, patient triage levels, post-triage destination area and the Jones Dependency Tool Score were examined employing multiple linear regression models.

Results: 161 nurses, caring for 591 patients, were included. 67% of the variation in 'direct' care time could be explained with a model based on triage level and two items of the Jones Dependency Tool (ABC perturbation and mobility). The number of new patients admitted and nurses' perceived workload were also highly associated with the total nursing care time TNCT. The actual number of patients in the ED at any time explained 78% of the variation in TNCT. Each additional patient increases the TNTC by 45.22 min.

Conclusions: Simple indicators might be used to evaluate the nursing care time in Belgian EDs. A retrospective method is suggested, using the total number of patients over a defined period of time. This study reveals a path to a predictive method to calculate the direct care time for each patient with three simple indicators, available from nursing triage stage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估比利时急诊科护理工作量的多中心横断面研究。
背景:急诊科(ED)的过度工作量对患者安全产生负面影响,往往导致由于时间限制而错过关键任务。比利时开发的急诊护士工作量评估(WANE)量表提供了护理工作量的详细测量,但其复杂性使其难以在实践中使用。我们的研究旨在寻找一种更简单的方法来评估急诊科的护理工作量。方法:在2022年9月至2023年3月期间对4名比利时急诊科进行了一项多中心横断面研究。采用WANE量表对各医院的护理工作量进行评估,时间为4小时。采用多元线性回归模型检验WANE评分与护士主观工作量评估、患者数量、患者分诊水平、分诊后目的地和Jones依赖工具评分之间的关系。结果:共纳入161名护士,护理591名患者。67%的“直接”护理时间的变化可以用基于分诊水平和Jones依赖工具的两个项目(ABC扰动和流动性)的模型来解释。新入院患者数量和护士感知工作量也与总护理时间TNCT高度相关。任何时候急诊科的实际病人数量解释了78%的TNCT变异。每增加一名患者,TNTC增加45.22分钟。结论:比利时急诊科护理时间可采用简单指标进行评价。建议采用回顾性方法,在确定的时间段内使用患者总数。本研究揭示了一种预测方法的路径,以三个简单的指标来计算每个病人的直接护理时间,可从护理分诊阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信