Fecal calprotectin from ileostomy output in patients with Crohn's disease.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jung-Bin Park, Jeongkuk Seo, Ji Eun Baek, June Hwa Bae, Seung Wook Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sung Wook Hwang
{"title":"Fecal calprotectin from ileostomy output in patients with Crohn's disease.","authors":"Jung-Bin Park, Jeongkuk Seo, Ji Eun Baek, June Hwa Bae, Seung Wook Hong, Sang Hyoung Park, Dong-Hoon Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Sung Wook Hwang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03652-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a reliable biomarker widely used for assessing disease activity and postoperative monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease (CD); however, its efficacy in patients with an ileostomy is poorly understood. Our study evaluated whether FC from the ileostomy output can be used to predict postoperative small bowel inflammation in patients with CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with CD and an ileostomy who had undergone FC measurement between January 1, 2015, and December 30, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were enrolled in the study if they had undergone FC tests with concurrent imaging and/or endoscopic studies, facilitating comparison between FC tests and imaging and/or endoscopic examinations. FC measured with the point-of care (POC) test was denoted as FC-POCT, and that measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was denoted as FC-ELISA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 101 patients and 224 FC test results. FC concentration differed significantly in patients with signs of small bowel inflammation on imaging and/or ileoscopy compared with those in remission (FC-POCT: median 191.0 µg/g; interquartile range [IQR], 94.6-499.0 µg/g vs. 29.9 µg/g; IQR, 29.9-50.0 µg/g; P < 0.001; FC-ELISA: median 252.5 µg/g; IQR, 118.5-911.0 µg/g vs. 16.8 µg/g, IQR, 8.2-33.0 µg/g; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for FC-POCT and FC-ELISA to distinguish between small bowel inflammation and remission was 63.3 µg/g (area under the curve [AUC], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97) and 40.1 µg/g (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99), respectively. We also compared the diagnostic accuracy between the POC and ELISA testing methods and found no statistically significant difference (P = 0.692).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FC from the ileostomy output is a valuable biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity for monitoring small bowel inflammation in postoperative patients with CD and an ileostomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03652-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a reliable biomarker widely used for assessing disease activity and postoperative monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease (CD); however, its efficacy in patients with an ileostomy is poorly understood. Our study evaluated whether FC from the ileostomy output can be used to predict postoperative small bowel inflammation in patients with CD.

Methods: Data from patients with CD and an ileostomy who had undergone FC measurement between January 1, 2015, and December 30, 2022, were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were enrolled in the study if they had undergone FC tests with concurrent imaging and/or endoscopic studies, facilitating comparison between FC tests and imaging and/or endoscopic examinations. FC measured with the point-of care (POC) test was denoted as FC-POCT, and that measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was denoted as FC-ELISA.

Results: This study analyzed 101 patients and 224 FC test results. FC concentration differed significantly in patients with signs of small bowel inflammation on imaging and/or ileoscopy compared with those in remission (FC-POCT: median 191.0 µg/g; interquartile range [IQR], 94.6-499.0 µg/g vs. 29.9 µg/g; IQR, 29.9-50.0 µg/g; P < 0.001; FC-ELISA: median 252.5 µg/g; IQR, 118.5-911.0 µg/g vs. 16.8 µg/g, IQR, 8.2-33.0 µg/g; P < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value for FC-POCT and FC-ELISA to distinguish between small bowel inflammation and remission was 63.3 µg/g (area under the curve [AUC], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97) and 40.1 µg/g (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.99), respectively. We also compared the diagnostic accuracy between the POC and ELISA testing methods and found no statistically significant difference (P = 0.692).

Conclusions: FC from the ileostomy output is a valuable biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity for monitoring small bowel inflammation in postoperative patients with CD and an ileostomy.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信