Efficacy of intranasal sedation for pediatric dental procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kavitha Swaminathan, Sushmita Shan, Monika Sri Ss, Apathsakayan Renugalakshmi, Ramanathan Ravi, Selvakumar Haridoss
{"title":"Efficacy of intranasal sedation for pediatric dental procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kavitha Swaminathan, Sushmita Shan, Monika Sri Ss, Apathsakayan Renugalakshmi, Ramanathan Ravi, Selvakumar Haridoss","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental fear and anxiety management in children is considered one of the biggest challenges in pediatric dentistry. Intranasal sedation is a promising technique for managing unco-operative pediatric patients with rapid onset, ease of administration, and minimal invasiveness. We aimed to review the efficacy, onset time, duration, and behavioral success of intranasal sedation agents in pediatric dental procedures and identify the most effective regimens for clinical practice. This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing intranasal sedation in children undergoing dental procedures. Primary outcomes were onset time, duration of sedation, and sedation success rates. The inclusion criteria were applied through search in six databases. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Meta-analyses were carried out using RevMan software, where pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences were calculated on efficacy outcomes. Eighteen RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria, where intranasal agents such as midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and their combinations were used. Meta analyses demonstrated intranasal sedation generally has a faster onset (moderate heterogeneity, I<sup>2</sup> = 40%) and is associated with greater success rates for achieving sedation than other methods. A combination of midazolam with ketamine or dexmedetomidine provided better results for both onset and behavioral success. The duration of sedation appears equivalent to oral or intravenous routes. Overall risk of bias was moderate due to blinding and selective reporting concerns. Midazolam, especially when combined with ketamine or dexmedetomidine, yielded promising results in relation to rapid onset and success of sedation. However, further large-scale RCTs are necessary to standardize dosing protocols and ensure that these findings are validated and optimized for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental fear and anxiety management in children is considered one of the biggest challenges in pediatric dentistry. Intranasal sedation is a promising technique for managing unco-operative pediatric patients with rapid onset, ease of administration, and minimal invasiveness. We aimed to review the efficacy, onset time, duration, and behavioral success of intranasal sedation agents in pediatric dental procedures and identify the most effective regimens for clinical practice. This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing intranasal sedation in children undergoing dental procedures. Primary outcomes were onset time, duration of sedation, and sedation success rates. The inclusion criteria were applied through search in six databases. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Meta-analyses were carried out using RevMan software, where pooled odds ratios and weighted mean differences were calculated on efficacy outcomes. Eighteen RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria, where intranasal agents such as midazolam, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and their combinations were used. Meta analyses demonstrated intranasal sedation generally has a faster onset (moderate heterogeneity, I2 = 40%) and is associated with greater success rates for achieving sedation than other methods. A combination of midazolam with ketamine or dexmedetomidine provided better results for both onset and behavioral success. The duration of sedation appears equivalent to oral or intravenous routes. Overall risk of bias was moderate due to blinding and selective reporting concerns. Midazolam, especially when combined with ketamine or dexmedetomidine, yielded promising results in relation to rapid onset and success of sedation. However, further large-scale RCTs are necessary to standardize dosing protocols and ensure that these findings are validated and optimized for clinical applications.

儿童牙科手术中鼻内镇静剂的功效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
儿童对牙科的恐惧和焦虑管理被认为是儿童牙科最大的挑战之一。鼻内镇静是治疗不合作儿科患者的一种有前途的技术,具有起病快、易于给药和微创。我们的目的是回顾鼻内镇静剂在儿科牙科手术中的疗效、起效时间、持续时间和行为成功,并确定临床实践中最有效的方案。该系统综述遵循PRISMA 2020指南,纳入了评估接受牙科手术的儿童鼻内镇静的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结局为起效时间、镇静持续时间和镇静成功率。通过对6个数据库的检索,应用纳入标准。使用Cochrane RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。使用RevMan软件进行meta分析,计算疗效结果的合并优势比和加权平均差异。18项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,其中使用了咪达唑仑、氯胺酮、右美托咪定等鼻内药物及其组合。Meta分析表明,鼻内镇静通常起效更快(中等异质性,I2 = 40%),并且与其他方法相比,实现镇静的成功率更高。咪达唑仑与氯胺酮或右美托咪定联合使用在发病和行为成功方面都有更好的效果。镇静的持续时间似乎与口服或静脉注射途径相当。由于盲法和选择性报道的考虑,总体偏倚风险为中等。咪达唑仑,特别是与氯胺酮或右美托咪定联合使用时,在快速起效和镇静成功方面产生了令人满意的结果。然而,进一步的大规模随机对照试验是必要的,以标准化给药方案,并确保这些发现得到验证和优化临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信