Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jun Song, Luis Carrillo, Jasmine Tibon, Sylvia Botros-Brey, Elizabeth Evans, Alexandriah Alas
{"title":"Tamsulosin to Prevent Urinary Retention After Vaginal Urogynecologic Surgery.","authors":"Jun Song, Luis Carrillo, Jasmine Tibon, Sylvia Botros-Brey, Elizabeth Evans, Alexandriah Alas","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) affects up to 51% of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Effective prevention strategies remain elusive, although alpha receptor antagonists show promise in recent literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative tamsulosin on POUR after vaginal surgery for POP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of female patients undergoing vaginal surgery for POP, with or without concomitant midurethral sling. Patients who received preoperative tamsulosin were compared with controls. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery after undergoing a standardized voiding trial. The primary outcome was the rate of POUR, defined by a failed voiding trial. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and risk factors for POUR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 195 patients were included for analysis, with 60 patients (30.8%) receiving tamsulosin and 135 (69.2%) not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except the tamsulosin group had lower parity and were less likely to splint to void. The tamsulosin group had similar rates of POUR compared with control (31.7% vs 34.8%, P = 0.67). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for confounders showed no significant effect of tamsulosin on POUR rates (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.35; P = 0.24). Concomitant sling placement was identified as the only independent risk factor for POUR (odds ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-5.81; P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative tamsulosin does not appear to be effective in preventing postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing vaginal surgery for POP, whereas concomitant sling placement appears to increase its risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) affects up to 51% of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Effective prevention strategies remain elusive, although alpha receptor antagonists show promise in recent literature.

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the effect of preoperative tamsulosin on POUR after vaginal surgery for POP.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of female patients undergoing vaginal surgery for POP, with or without concomitant midurethral sling. Patients who received preoperative tamsulosin were compared with controls. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery after undergoing a standardized voiding trial. The primary outcome was the rate of POUR, defined by a failed voiding trial. Secondary outcomes included complication rates and risk factors for POUR.

Results: A total of 195 patients were included for analysis, with 60 patients (30.8%) receiving tamsulosin and 135 (69.2%) not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except the tamsulosin group had lower parity and were less likely to splint to void. The tamsulosin group had similar rates of POUR compared with control (31.7% vs 34.8%, P = 0.67). Multivariate logistic regression controlling for confounders showed no significant effect of tamsulosin on POUR rates (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-1.35; P = 0.24). Concomitant sling placement was identified as the only independent risk factor for POUR (odds ratio, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-5.81; P = 0.001).

Conclusions: Preoperative tamsulosin does not appear to be effective in preventing postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing vaginal surgery for POP, whereas concomitant sling placement appears to increase its risk.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信