Communicating with Deaf Patients in the Clinical Environment: Lessons Learned from a Virtual Patient Panel.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20608.1
Natalie P Snyder, Benedicta O Olonilua, Rosemary Frasso, Julia Croce, Dimitrios Papanagnou
{"title":"Communicating with Deaf Patients in the Clinical Environment: Lessons Learned from a Virtual Patient Panel.","authors":"Natalie P Snyder, Benedicta O Olonilua, Rosemary Frasso, Julia Croce, Dimitrios Papanagnou","doi":"10.12688/mep.20608.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication and cultural differences predispose Deaf patients to suboptimal healthcare. Despite this disparity, health professionals have historically received little to no training in caring for Deaf patients. Patient panels are an effective tool in medical education to model communication strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, and results of a virtual patient panel focused on communicating with Deaf patients in clinical contexts. We offer practical suggestions for incorporating similar educational interventions in health professions education to prepare trainees to effectively navigate these conversations with their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The panel consisted of a one-hour question and answer discussion facilitated by the authors with Deaf patients and Certified Deaf Interpreters (CDI). The panel was presented to 271 second-year medical students at our institution in November of 2023. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using pile-sorting qualitative analysis to identify main themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 73 respondents, with a response rate of 27%. After the panel, the most popular takeaway points from student reflections included communication ( <i>n</i>=56, 77%) and access to care ( <i>n</i>=47, 64%), followed by autonomy ( <i>n</i>=17, 23%), the doctor-patient relationship ( <i>n</i>=15, 21%), and culture ( <i>n</i>=11, 15%). Based on this initiative, we identified and offer twelve tips for developing similar exercises. These tips are thematically presented under three groupings: Planning Considerations, Patient Panelist Considerations, In-Session Considerations, and Post-Session Considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This patient panel was the first of its kind in our medical school curriculum. Important considerations in panel design and implementation should focus on delivery time constraints with live-interpreting and further exploring the role of trust and communication in the physician-patient relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20608.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communication and cultural differences predispose Deaf patients to suboptimal healthcare. Despite this disparity, health professionals have historically received little to no training in caring for Deaf patients. Patient panels are an effective tool in medical education to model communication strategies.

Objective: In this paper, we describe the design, implementation, and results of a virtual patient panel focused on communicating with Deaf patients in clinical contexts. We offer practical suggestions for incorporating similar educational interventions in health professions education to prepare trainees to effectively navigate these conversations with their patients.

Methods: The panel consisted of a one-hour question and answer discussion facilitated by the authors with Deaf patients and Certified Deaf Interpreters (CDI). The panel was presented to 271 second-year medical students at our institution in November of 2023. Following this discussion, students were encouraged to share one or two key takeaways from the session through a survey link. These results were analyzed using pile-sorting qualitative analysis to identify main themes.

Results: There were 73 respondents, with a response rate of 27%. After the panel, the most popular takeaway points from student reflections included communication ( n=56, 77%) and access to care ( n=47, 64%), followed by autonomy ( n=17, 23%), the doctor-patient relationship ( n=15, 21%), and culture ( n=11, 15%). Based on this initiative, we identified and offer twelve tips for developing similar exercises. These tips are thematically presented under three groupings: Planning Considerations, Patient Panelist Considerations, In-Session Considerations, and Post-Session Considerations.

Conclusion: This patient panel was the first of its kind in our medical school curriculum. Important considerations in panel design and implementation should focus on delivery time constraints with live-interpreting and further exploring the role of trust and communication in the physician-patient relationship.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信