Long-acting reversible contraceptive preference and initiation among clinic-based and telemedicine medication abortion patients at one academic health system in California

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Rebecca Woofter , Rajita Patil , May Sudhinaraset , Jessica Gipson
{"title":"Long-acting reversible contraceptive preference and initiation among clinic-based and telemedicine medication abortion patients at one academic health system in California","authors":"Rebecca Woofter ,&nbsp;Rajita Patil ,&nbsp;May Sudhinaraset ,&nbsp;Jessica Gipson","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine possible differences in postabortion long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) preference and initiation among clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We examined electronic medical records among 576 medication abortion patients at one health system in California between 2020 and 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 25% of patients preferred LARC and 21% initiated LARC. Among those who preferred LARC, 77% initiated LARC. No statistically significant differences were found in LARC preference or initiation across medication abortion modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this health system, clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients did not differ in postabortion LARC preference or initiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"145 ","pages":"Article 110838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425000290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine possible differences in postabortion long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) preference and initiation among clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients.

Study design

We examined electronic medical records among 576 medication abortion patients at one health system in California between 2020 and 2022.

Results

Overall, 25% of patients preferred LARC and 21% initiated LARC. Among those who preferred LARC, 77% initiated LARC. No statistically significant differences were found in LARC preference or initiation across medication abortion modalities.

Conclusions

In this health system, clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients did not differ in postabortion LARC preference or initiation.
在加州的一个学术卫生系统中,临床和远程医疗药物流产患者的长效可逆避孕偏好和启动。
目的:探讨临床用药流产(CMA)和远程医疗用药流产(TMA)患者对流产后长效可逆避孕(LARC)的偏好和启动可能存在的差异。研究设计:我们检查了2020-2022年间加州一个学术卫生系统中药物流产患者的电子病历(N=576)。结果:总体而言,25%的患者首选LARC, 21%的患者开始LARC。在偏好LARC的人中,77%的人发起了LARC。不同药物流产方式的LARC偏好和起始无统计学差异。结论:在该卫生系统中,接受CMA和TMA的患者在流产后LARC偏好或开始方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信