Comparison of Two Coronary Anastomosis Techniques in Terms of Flow Rate in Porcine Hearts.

Safa Gode, Mucahit Polat, Elif Guneysu, Timucin Aksu, Olgar Bayserke, Muhammed Bayram, Ulku Kafa Kulacoglu, Taner Iyigun, Zihni Mert Duman, Oznur Inan
{"title":"Comparison of Two Coronary Anastomosis Techniques in Terms of Flow Rate in Porcine Hearts.","authors":"Safa Gode, Mucahit Polat, Elif Guneysu, Timucin Aksu, Olgar Bayserke, Muhammed Bayram, Ulku Kafa Kulacoglu, Taner Iyigun, Zihni Mert Duman, Oznur Inan","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quality of coronary anastomoses is one of the important parameters that may affect graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Therefore, we compared two different anastomotic techniques to improve graft flow and patency rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted by performing two different fashions of anastomosis with a human saphenous vein graft on 24 various coronary segments of five postmortem porcine hearts. Each arteriotomy was used for both anastomotic techniques. In the first method, epicardial fat tissue around the coronary artery was involved to the saphenous vein anastomosis line (coronary wall and epicardial fat tissue [CWE] technique). In the second method, the saphenous vein graft was sutured to the coronary wall only, without involving epicardial fat tissue (only coronary wall [OCW] technique).The time it tookfor 30 cc of 0.9% isotonic saline solution to pass through the anastomosis in a free-flow fashion by gravity was measured following each technique. Additionally, the anastomotic areas in mm2 were measured and compared between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean flow time for the CWE technique was 77.5 ± 21.4 seconds, whereas for the OCW technique, it was 87.2 ± 19.5 seconds (P<0.001). The flow rates were 23.2 ml/min and 20.6 ml/min, respectively. The anastomotic area was 3.947 mm2 for the CWE technique and 1.430 mm2 for the OCW technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the sutures penetrate both the epicardial fat tissue and the coronary artery wall simultaneously, a larger anastomosis area can be created. Consequently, potentially better graft flow and hemodynamic performance could be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 1","pages":"e20240073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The quality of coronary anastomoses is one of the important parameters that may affect graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting patients. Therefore, we compared two different anastomotic techniques to improve graft flow and patency rates.

Methods: This study was conducted by performing two different fashions of anastomosis with a human saphenous vein graft on 24 various coronary segments of five postmortem porcine hearts. Each arteriotomy was used for both anastomotic techniques. In the first method, epicardial fat tissue around the coronary artery was involved to the saphenous vein anastomosis line (coronary wall and epicardial fat tissue [CWE] technique). In the second method, the saphenous vein graft was sutured to the coronary wall only, without involving epicardial fat tissue (only coronary wall [OCW] technique).The time it tookfor 30 cc of 0.9% isotonic saline solution to pass through the anastomosis in a free-flow fashion by gravity was measured following each technique. Additionally, the anastomotic areas in mm2 were measured and compared between the two techniques.

Results: The mean flow time for the CWE technique was 77.5 ± 21.4 seconds, whereas for the OCW technique, it was 87.2 ± 19.5 seconds (P<0.001). The flow rates were 23.2 ml/min and 20.6 ml/min, respectively. The anastomotic area was 3.947 mm2 for the CWE technique and 1.430 mm2 for the OCW technique.

Conclusion: When the sutures penetrate both the epicardial fat tissue and the coronary artery wall simultaneously, a larger anastomosis area can be created. Consequently, potentially better graft flow and hemodynamic performance could be achieved.

两种冠状动脉吻合技术在猪心脏流速方面的比较。
导言:冠状动脉吻合口质量是影响冠状动脉搭桥术患者冠脉通畅的重要参数之一。因此,我们比较了两种不同的吻合技术来改善移植物流动和通畅率。方法:采用两种不同的吻合方式,将人隐静脉移植到5只死猪心脏的24个不同冠状动脉段上。两种吻合技术均采用动脉切开术。第一种方法将冠状动脉周围的心外膜脂肪组织累及隐静脉吻合线(冠状动脉壁与心外膜脂肪组织[CWE]技术)。第二种方法是将隐静脉移植物仅缝合于冠状动脉壁,不累及心外膜脂肪组织(仅冠状动脉壁[OCW]技术)。在每种技术之后,测量30cc 0.9%等渗盐水溶液在重力作用下以自由流动的方式通过吻合口所需的时间。此外,测量并比较两种方法的吻合面积(mm2)。结果:CWE技术的平均血流时间为77.5±21.4秒,OCW技术的平均血流时间为87.2±19.5秒。结论:当缝合线同时穿透心外膜脂肪组织和冠状动脉壁时,可创造更大的吻合面积。因此,可以实现更好的移植物流动和血流动力学性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信