Pregnancy intention, preconception health, health behaviours, and information and health advice seeking among expectant male partners.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tristan Carter, Danielle Schoenaker, Jon Adams, Amie Steel
{"title":"Pregnancy intention, preconception health, health behaviours, and information and health advice seeking among expectant male partners.","authors":"Tristan Carter, Danielle Schoenaker, Jon Adams, Amie Steel","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02703-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Attempting pregnancy as a conscious decision (pregnancy intention) can impact the likelihood that a future parent receives or seeks preconception health information, initiates discussions with health professionals, and ultimately optimises their health and behaviours in preparation for healthy pregnancy and child. Knowledge about the relationship between men's preconception health behaviours and their pregnancy intention is only emerging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study aimed to describe the preconception health status, behaviours, information- and advice-seeking of male expectant partners, and to explore differences in these preconception factors based on pregnancy intention. An online retrospective cross-sectional survey was completed by male reproductive partners of pregnant females. Their pregnancy intention was assessed using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP). Participants were recruited via social media and all variables were self-reported by expectant partners. Chi-square tests examined differences by LMUP categories (planned or ambivalent/unplanned).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 156 expectant partners who consented to survey participation, 138 completed all LMUP questions and were included in analysis. Most expectant partners reported their partner's current pregnancy as planned (n = 90;65.2%), less than half reported looking for and finding information about becoming pregnant (40.0%). Expectant partners with planned pregnancy more often reported physical exercise three months before pregnancy compared with partners with unplanned/ambivalent pregnancy (p = 0.001). Expectant partners with ambivalent/unplanned pregnancy more often experienced longstanding illness, disability, or infirmity (p = 0.002) or disregarded contraception (p < 0.001). Despite perceiving good or excellent health, and undertaking physical exercise, numerous expectant partners with planned pregnancy had overweight. Further research exploring the reproductive life plan process for males with longstanding chronic illness or disability may help promote pregnancy planning and preconception health amongst this sub-population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further large-scale studies are needed to enable clinicians to better understand pregnancy intentions and preconception health of males and for policy makers to formulate health policies aimed at supporting male preconception health and awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11817563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02703-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Attempting pregnancy as a conscious decision (pregnancy intention) can impact the likelihood that a future parent receives or seeks preconception health information, initiates discussions with health professionals, and ultimately optimises their health and behaviours in preparation for healthy pregnancy and child. Knowledge about the relationship between men's preconception health behaviours and their pregnancy intention is only emerging.

Methods: This study aimed to describe the preconception health status, behaviours, information- and advice-seeking of male expectant partners, and to explore differences in these preconception factors based on pregnancy intention. An online retrospective cross-sectional survey was completed by male reproductive partners of pregnant females. Their pregnancy intention was assessed using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP). Participants were recruited via social media and all variables were self-reported by expectant partners. Chi-square tests examined differences by LMUP categories (planned or ambivalent/unplanned).

Results: Of 156 expectant partners who consented to survey participation, 138 completed all LMUP questions and were included in analysis. Most expectant partners reported their partner's current pregnancy as planned (n = 90;65.2%), less than half reported looking for and finding information about becoming pregnant (40.0%). Expectant partners with planned pregnancy more often reported physical exercise three months before pregnancy compared with partners with unplanned/ambivalent pregnancy (p = 0.001). Expectant partners with ambivalent/unplanned pregnancy more often experienced longstanding illness, disability, or infirmity (p = 0.002) or disregarded contraception (p < 0.001). Despite perceiving good or excellent health, and undertaking physical exercise, numerous expectant partners with planned pregnancy had overweight. Further research exploring the reproductive life plan process for males with longstanding chronic illness or disability may help promote pregnancy planning and preconception health amongst this sub-population.

Conclusions: Further large-scale studies are needed to enable clinicians to better understand pregnancy intentions and preconception health of males and for policy makers to formulate health policies aimed at supporting male preconception health and awareness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信