Urethral bulking agents and pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in female patients with multiple sclerosis.

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2024.0049
Georgios Antoniadis, Ioannis Tsikopoulos, Aikaterini Tsionga, Konstantinos Galanoulis, Nikolaos Bousdroukis, Michael Samarinas
{"title":"Urethral bulking agents and pelvic floor muscle training for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in female patients with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Georgios Antoniadis, Ioannis Tsikopoulos, Aikaterini Tsionga, Konstantinos Galanoulis, Nikolaos Bousdroukis, Michael Samarinas","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2024.0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), characterized by involuntary urine leakage during increased abdominal pressure, is prevalent among women with multiple sclerosis (MS), significantly impacting their quality of life (QoL). Traditional treatments are less suitable for MS patients due to potential complications, highlighting the need for less invasive alternatives, <i>that is</i>, urethral bulking agents (UBAs) and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). UBAs increase urethral tissue volume, while PFMT strengthens pelvic muscles. Despite promising outcomes, their efficacy in MS-related SUI is under-researched.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the effectiveness of UBAs and PFMT in managing SUI among female patients with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nine-month study involved 14 female MS patients with moderate SUI, who were equally divided into two groups to evaluate the effectiveness of UBAs and PFMT. UBAs were administered through injections to enhance urethral resistance, while PFMT used guided exercises to improve pelvic control. Outcomes were assessed in terms of urinary pad usage, scores of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and QoL metrics to evaluate reductions in incontinence and symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both treatment groups showed significant improvement with SUI management. Daily pad usage decreased to 0-1 in both groups, with reductions in symptom severity and improvements in QoL scores. UBAs provided quicker symptomatic relief, while PFMT supported long-term management. However, two participants in the PFMT group discontinued follow-up due to MS-related complications, highlighting the challenges of maintaining adherence in progressive conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UBAs and PFMT are effective management options for SUI in MS patients, improving symptom control and QoL. This study underscored the importance of individualized, multimodal approaches to optimize outcomes for women with MS-related SUI. Nevertheless, further research is needed for long-term validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"11 4","pages":"e21200028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), characterized by involuntary urine leakage during increased abdominal pressure, is prevalent among women with multiple sclerosis (MS), significantly impacting their quality of life (QoL). Traditional treatments are less suitable for MS patients due to potential complications, highlighting the need for less invasive alternatives, that is, urethral bulking agents (UBAs) and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). UBAs increase urethral tissue volume, while PFMT strengthens pelvic muscles. Despite promising outcomes, their efficacy in MS-related SUI is under-researched.

Objective: This study assessed the effectiveness of UBAs and PFMT in managing SUI among female patients with MS.

Methods: This nine-month study involved 14 female MS patients with moderate SUI, who were equally divided into two groups to evaluate the effectiveness of UBAs and PFMT. UBAs were administered through injections to enhance urethral resistance, while PFMT used guided exercises to improve pelvic control. Outcomes were assessed in terms of urinary pad usage, scores of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, and QoL metrics to evaluate reductions in incontinence and symptom severity.

Results: Both treatment groups showed significant improvement with SUI management. Daily pad usage decreased to 0-1 in both groups, with reductions in symptom severity and improvements in QoL scores. UBAs provided quicker symptomatic relief, while PFMT supported long-term management. However, two participants in the PFMT group discontinued follow-up due to MS-related complications, highlighting the challenges of maintaining adherence in progressive conditions.

Conclusion: UBAs and PFMT are effective management options for SUI in MS patients, improving symptom control and QoL. This study underscored the importance of individualized, multimodal approaches to optimize outcomes for women with MS-related SUI. Nevertheless, further research is needed for long-term validation.

尿道膨胀剂和盆底肌肉训练用于治疗多发性硬化症女性患者的压力性尿失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信