Suicide Risk and Social Connectedness in Cisgender and Transgender Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer/Questioning Youth in the Emergency Department.

IF 5.5 2区医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS

Journal of Adolescent Health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.241

August X Wei, Annabelle M Mournet, Patrick C Ryan, Donna A Ruch, Maryland Pao, Lisa M Horowitz, Jeffrey A Bridge

{"title":"Suicide Risk and Social Connectedness in Cisgender and Transgender Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Queer/Questioning Youth in the Emergency Department.","authors":"August X Wei, Annabelle M Mournet, Patrick C Ryan, Donna A Ruch, Maryland Pao, Lisa M Horowitz, Jeffrey A Bridge","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) youth are at high suicide risk. Family/peer connectedness may be protective factors; few studies assess social connectedness within cisgender lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (cis-LGBQ) and transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) samples. This study aims to identify associations between family/peer connectedness and suicidal thoughts/behaviors (STBs) among cisgender-LGBQ and TGD youth to better inform suicide prevention strategies.Methods: This study utilized data from LGBTQ youth aged 12-17 in the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide study. Youth completed measures for STBs (Ask Suicide-Screening Questions and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale) and family/peer connectedness (\"low,\" \"moderate,\" and \"high\"). Logistic regression analyses examined associations between family/peer connectedness and STBs in cis-LGBQ and TGD youth.Results: 53.2% (607/1,140) of cis-LGBQ and 69.7% (99/142) of TGD youth self-reported STBs. For cis-LGBQ youth, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[6.8-14.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 3.5[2.7-4.7]) and low versus moderate (p < .001, adjOR = 2.8[1.9-4.0]). Regarding cis-LGBQ peer connectedness, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high (p < .01, adjOR = 1.8[1.2-2.7]; p < .05, adjOR = 1.5[1.1-2.1]), not low versus moderate (p = .4). For TGD youth, the odds of reporting STBs significantly increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[3.7-28.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 7.7[2.8-22.8]), not when comparing low versus moderate (p = .7). Peer connectedness levels had no significant associations with TGD youths' STB rates (p = .2, p = .3, p = .8).Discussion: LGBTQ, especially TGD youth, are at elevated suicide risk. High levels of family connectedness may especially help mitigate suicide risk in TGD youth. Future research should replicate findings in larger TGD samples and adapt LGBTQ-specific, family-based emergency department interventions.","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.11.241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) youth are at high suicide risk. Family/peer connectedness may be protective factors; few studies assess social connectedness within cisgender lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (cis-LGBQ) and transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) samples. This study aims to identify associations between family/peer connectedness and suicidal thoughts/behaviors (STBs) among cisgender-LGBQ and TGD youth to better inform suicide prevention strategies.

Methods: This study utilized data from LGBTQ youth aged 12-17 in the Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide study. Youth completed measures for STBs (Ask Suicide-Screening Questions and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale) and family/peer connectedness ("low," "moderate," and "high"). Logistic regression analyses examined associations between family/peer connectedness and STBs in cis-LGBQ and TGD youth.

Results: 53.2% (607/1,140) of cis-LGBQ and 69.7% (99/142) of TGD youth self-reported STBs. For cis-LGBQ youth, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[6.8-14.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 3.5[2.7-4.7]) and low versus moderate (p < .001, adjOR = 2.8[1.9-4.0]). Regarding cis-LGBQ peer connectedness, the odds of reporting STBs increased when comparing low/moderate versus high (p < .01, adjOR = 1.8[1.2-2.7]; p < .05, adjOR = 1.5[1.1-2.1]), not low versus moderate (p = .4). For TGD youth, the odds of reporting STBs significantly increased when comparing low/moderate versus high family connectedness (p < .001, adjOR = 9.8[3.7-28.2]; p < .001, adjOR = 7.7[2.8-22.8]), not when comparing low versus moderate (p = .7). Peer connectedness levels had no significant associations with TGD youths' STB rates (p = .2, p = .3, p = .8).

Discussion: LGBTQ, especially TGD youth, are at elevated suicide risk. High levels of family connectedness may especially help mitigate suicide risk in TGD youth. Future research should replicate findings in larger TGD samples and adapt LGBTQ-specific, family-based emergency department interventions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Adolescent Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

10.40

自引率

3.90%

发文量

526

审稿时长

46 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.