Prostate brachytherapy boost: Long-term results of protocol-based treatment of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2024.146671
Claudia Schweizer, Vratislav Strnad, Ricarda Merten, Philipp Schubert, Michael Lotter, Stephan Kreppner, Rainer Fietkau, Andre Karius
{"title":"Prostate brachytherapy boost: Long-term results of protocol-based treatment of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer.","authors":"Claudia Schweizer, Vratislav Strnad, Ricarda Merten, Philipp Schubert, Michael Lotter, Stephan Kreppner, Rainer Fietkau, Andre Karius","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.146671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of interstitial temporary brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer patients using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Between 2008 and 2016, 115 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost (BT boost) were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Patients received either interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 2 x 9-9.5 Gray (Gy) schedule or pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with 35 Gy as boost after EBRT (50.4 Gy), up to a total dose of 86-98 Gy (EQD<sub>2α/β</sub> = 3). Primary endpoints of the present analysis were cumulative local recurrence rate (LRR), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), tumor-specific survival, and overall survival (OS). As secondary objective, treatment-related toxicity was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up time was 87 (range, 9-159) months, and the median age was 72 (range, 48-83) years. The median prostate specific antigen value (PSA) was 12.2 (range, 2.4-288) ng/ml. 78/115 (68%) patients had high-risk prostate cancer according to the D'Amico classification. At 7 years, the cumulative LRR for the whole cohort was 1.8%. The 7-year bRFS, cancer-specific survival, and OS were 85.2%, 97.3%, and 88.9%. The 5-year prevalence of late toxicity grade 3 or higher according to the LENT-SOMA scale was 4%. There were no significant differences for treatment outcome or toxicity for HDR vs. PDR treatment. A prostate gland of 50 cm<sup>3</sup> or more was not associated with worse treatment efficacy or increased side effects, apart from the prevalence of urethritis after 5 years (<i>p</i> = 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BT boost in patients with prostate cancer is efficient and well-tolerated, with low rates of side effects also in elderly patients. HDR- and PDR-BT were equally efficient and well-tolerated. A large prostate gland is no contraindication for BT. Therefore, BT boost should be offered to all eligible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"16 6","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.146671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of interstitial temporary brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer patients using real-world data.

Material and methods: Between 2008 and 2016, 115 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by a brachytherapy boost (BT boost) were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Patients received either interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with 2 x 9-9.5 Gray (Gy) schedule or pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) with 35 Gy as boost after EBRT (50.4 Gy), up to a total dose of 86-98 Gy (EQD2α/β = 3). Primary endpoints of the present analysis were cumulative local recurrence rate (LRR), biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), tumor-specific survival, and overall survival (OS). As secondary objective, treatment-related toxicity was evaluated.

Results: The median follow-up time was 87 (range, 9-159) months, and the median age was 72 (range, 48-83) years. The median prostate specific antigen value (PSA) was 12.2 (range, 2.4-288) ng/ml. 78/115 (68%) patients had high-risk prostate cancer according to the D'Amico classification. At 7 years, the cumulative LRR for the whole cohort was 1.8%. The 7-year bRFS, cancer-specific survival, and OS were 85.2%, 97.3%, and 88.9%. The 5-year prevalence of late toxicity grade 3 or higher according to the LENT-SOMA scale was 4%. There were no significant differences for treatment outcome or toxicity for HDR vs. PDR treatment. A prostate gland of 50 cm3 or more was not associated with worse treatment efficacy or increased side effects, apart from the prevalence of urethritis after 5 years (p = 0.035).

Conclusions: BT boost in patients with prostate cancer is efficient and well-tolerated, with low rates of side effects also in elderly patients. HDR- and PDR-BT were equally efficient and well-tolerated. A large prostate gland is no contraindication for BT. Therefore, BT boost should be offered to all eligible patients.

前列腺近距离治疗促进:非转移性前列腺癌患者基于方案治疗的长期结果。
目的:利用真实数据评价前列腺癌间质性临时近距离强化治疗的疗效和毒性。材料和方法:2008年至2016年间,115例接受外束放疗(EBRT)后进行近距离增强治疗(BT boost)的患者符合回顾性分析的条件。患者接受2 x 9-9.5 Gy的间质性高剂量率近距离放疗(HDR-BT)或脉冲剂量率近距离放疗(PDR-BT),在EBRT (50.4 Gy)后增加35 Gy,总剂量高达86-98 Gy (eqd1 α/β = 3)。本分析的主要终点是累积局部复发率(LRR)、生化无复发生存期(bRFS)、肿瘤特异性生存期和总生存期(OS)。作为次要目标,评估治疗相关的毒性。结果:中位随访时间87(范围9-159)个月,中位年龄72(范围48-83)岁。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)中位值为12.2(范围2.4 ~ 288)ng/ml。根据D'Amico分类,115例患者中有78例(68%)为高危前列腺癌。在7年时,整个队列的累积LRR为1.8%。7年bRFS、癌症特异性生存率和OS分别为85.2%、97.3%和88.9%。根据LENT-SOMA量表,晚期毒性3级及以上的5年患病率为4%。HDR与PDR治疗的治疗结果或毒性没有显著差异。除5年后尿道炎患病率外,前列腺面积≥50 cm3与治疗效果差或副作用增加无关(p = 0.035)。结论:前列腺癌患者的BT增强治疗有效且耐受性良好,老年患者的副作用率也很低。HDR- bt和PDR-BT同样有效且耐受性良好。前列腺肥大不是BT的禁忌症,因此,所有符合条件的患者都应接受BT增强治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信