{"title":"Injectable bio-absorbable spacers in brachytherapy for gynecological cancers: A scoping review.","authors":"Carminia Lapuz, Mollie Kain, Michael Chao, Daryl Lim Joon, Claire Dempsey, Jenny Sim","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.146834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Insertion of a spacer between tumor and an adjacent organ at risk may improve the therapeutic ratio in gynecological cancer brachytherapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the available literature on the use of injectable bio-absorbable spacers in brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until March 28, 2024. Studies reporting on injectable bio-absorbable spacers in gynecological cancer brachytherapy were included. Two independent reviewers completed screening, assessment for eligibility, and data extraction of included studies. Data were collected on spacer material, technique, safety, feasibility, spacer quality, dosimetric values, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 312 patients and 169 spacers. Clinical application was primarily in cervix cancer brachytherapy (47%) and spacer placement in the recto-vaginal space (88%). Eight different products were used, with no significant spacer-related adverse effects reported. Spacer insertion reduced rectal dose in eight studies, bladder dose in one study, sigmoid dose in four studies, and permitted tumor dose escalation in three studies. Five studies reported on tumor outcomes and eight studies on late toxicities. There were no studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injectable bio-absorbable spacers offer a promising approach for improving the therapeutic ratio in gynecological cancer brachytherapy. There is low certainty evidence available in the literature for their use, and rigorous prospective studies are needed to provide evidence on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"16 6","pages":"467-477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.146834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Insertion of a spacer between tumor and an adjacent organ at risk may improve the therapeutic ratio in gynecological cancer brachytherapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the available literature on the use of injectable bio-absorbable spacers in brachytherapy for gynecological cancers.
Material and methods: Embase, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until March 28, 2024. Studies reporting on injectable bio-absorbable spacers in gynecological cancer brachytherapy were included. Two independent reviewers completed screening, assessment for eligibility, and data extraction of included studies. Data were collected on spacer material, technique, safety, feasibility, spacer quality, dosimetric values, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Results: Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 312 patients and 169 spacers. Clinical application was primarily in cervix cancer brachytherapy (47%) and spacer placement in the recto-vaginal space (88%). Eight different products were used, with no significant spacer-related adverse effects reported. Spacer insertion reduced rectal dose in eight studies, bladder dose in one study, sigmoid dose in four studies, and permitted tumor dose escalation in three studies. Five studies reported on tumor outcomes and eight studies on late toxicities. There were no studies evaluating patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Conclusions: Injectable bio-absorbable spacers offer a promising approach for improving the therapeutic ratio in gynecological cancer brachytherapy. There is low certainty evidence available in the literature for their use, and rigorous prospective studies are needed to provide evidence on outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.