Kate E. Wallis MD, MPH , Sarah N. Wozniak-Kelly BA , Jaclyn Cacia MS, CCRC , Katherine K. Wu MPH , Cy Nadler PhD
{"title":"Suicide-Risk Identification Across Developmental and Behavioral Pediatric Practices: A DBPNet Study","authors":"Kate E. Wallis MD, MPH , Sarah N. Wozniak-Kelly BA , Jaclyn Cacia MS, CCRC , Katherine K. Wu MPH , Cy Nadler PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify variations in practices, facilitators of and barriers to universal suicide screening of children and adolescents with IDDs in pediatric developmental and behavioral health settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Centers from the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) were invited to describe suicide-screening practices in their developmental-behavioral pediatrics, psychology, and/or psychiatry clinics. A representative per site/specialty was asked to complete surveys (summarized with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (summarized using thematic analysis) to explore sites’ current practices, and barriers/facilitators to screening.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants included 34 survey respondents and 21 interviewees<em>.</em> Surveys revealed variation in suicide screening practices across sites; 44.1% of respondents reported that their practice conducts universal screening, but the screening processes varied widely. Interviews identified some facilitators to screening youth with IDD, such as standardizing procedures, training, and having staff available to respond to positive screens. Barriers to universal screening include factors at the patient, family, provider, and system levels. Insufficient mental health care systems, as well as a lack of IDD-specific supports, are significant challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite Joint Commission requirements and specific expertise in behavioral health, sites serving patients with IDD vary widely in how suicide screening is implemented and how positive screens are addressed. Findings offer opportunities to standardize procedures to increase suicide risk identification and response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 4","pages":"Article 102793"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187628592500018X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To identify variations in practices, facilitators of and barriers to universal suicide screening of children and adolescents with IDDs in pediatric developmental and behavioral health settings.
Methods
Centers from the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) were invited to describe suicide-screening practices in their developmental-behavioral pediatrics, psychology, and/or psychiatry clinics. A representative per site/specialty was asked to complete surveys (summarized with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (summarized using thematic analysis) to explore sites’ current practices, and barriers/facilitators to screening.
Results
Participants included 34 survey respondents and 21 interviewees. Surveys revealed variation in suicide screening practices across sites; 44.1% of respondents reported that their practice conducts universal screening, but the screening processes varied widely. Interviews identified some facilitators to screening youth with IDD, such as standardizing procedures, training, and having staff available to respond to positive screens. Barriers to universal screening include factors at the patient, family, provider, and system levels. Insufficient mental health care systems, as well as a lack of IDD-specific supports, are significant challenges.
Conclusions
Despite Joint Commission requirements and specific expertise in behavioral health, sites serving patients with IDD vary widely in how suicide screening is implemented and how positive screens are addressed. Findings offer opportunities to standardize procedures to increase suicide risk identification and response.
期刊介绍:
Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.