{"title":"Individualized and targeted coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients.","authors":"Nikolaus Hofmann, Herbert Schöchl, Johannes Gratz","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to summarize current evidence on hemostatic management of bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on resuscitation strategies using either coagulation factor concentrates or fixed-ratio transfusion concepts. It discusses the potential benefits and limitations of both approaches.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies have shown that coagulopathy caused by massive traumatic hemorrhage often cannot be reversed by empiric treatment. During initial resuscitation, a fixed-ratio transfusion approach uses the allogeneic blood products red blood cells, plasma, and platelets to mimic 'reconstituted whole blood'. However, this one-size-fits-all strategy risks both overtransfusion and undertransfusion in trauma patients. Many European trauma centers have shifted toward individualized hemostatic therapy based on point-of-care diagnostics, particularly using viscoelastic tests. These tests provide rapid insight into the patient's hemostatic deficiencies, enabling a more targeted and personalized treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Individualized, goal-directed hemostatic management offers several advantages over fixed-ratio transfusion therapy for trauma patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the direct comparison of these two approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":50609,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001467","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review aims to summarize current evidence on hemostatic management of bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on resuscitation strategies using either coagulation factor concentrates or fixed-ratio transfusion concepts. It discusses the potential benefits and limitations of both approaches.
Recent findings: Recent studies have shown that coagulopathy caused by massive traumatic hemorrhage often cannot be reversed by empiric treatment. During initial resuscitation, a fixed-ratio transfusion approach uses the allogeneic blood products red blood cells, plasma, and platelets to mimic 'reconstituted whole blood'. However, this one-size-fits-all strategy risks both overtransfusion and undertransfusion in trauma patients. Many European trauma centers have shifted toward individualized hemostatic therapy based on point-of-care diagnostics, particularly using viscoelastic tests. These tests provide rapid insight into the patient's hemostatic deficiencies, enabling a more targeted and personalized treatment approach.
Summary: Individualized, goal-directed hemostatic management offers several advantages over fixed-ratio transfusion therapy for trauma patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the direct comparison of these two approaches.
期刊介绍:
Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Anesthesiology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fifteen disciplines published across the year – including cardiovascular anesthesiology, neuroanesthesia and pain medicine – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.