Safety and efficacy of the unilateral, suture-based, dry-closure technique in percutaneous trans-axillary aortic valve implantation.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rutger-Jan Nuis, Thijmen W Hokken, Jenna van Niekerk, Lucas Uchoa de Assis, Rik Adrichem, Mark van den Dorpel, Joris Ooms, Isabella Kardys, Mattie Lenzen, Joost Daemen, Nicolas M Van Mieghem
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of the unilateral, suture-based, dry-closure technique in percutaneous trans-axillary aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Rutger-Jan Nuis, Thijmen W Hokken, Jenna van Niekerk, Lucas Uchoa de Assis, Rik Adrichem, Mark van den Dorpel, Joris Ooms, Isabella Kardys, Mattie Lenzen, Joost Daemen, Nicolas M Van Mieghem","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAx-TAVI) is the most used alternative access when severe iliofemoral disease renders transfemoral access infeasible. Compared to surgical transaxillary access, a true percutaneous approach using vascular closure devices (VCD) has advantages but can be challenging. Herein, we describe the impact of the \"unilateral, suture-mediated, dry-closure technique\" on vascular safety and efficacy in patients undergoing true percutaneous TAx-TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 77 patients undergoing percutaneous TAx-TAVI were categorized into a cohort before (C1, n = 40) and after (C2, n = 37) implementation of the suture-based dry-closure technique using an upstream occlusion balloon. In C1, arteriotomy closure mainly consisted of plug-based VCD. The primary (safety) endpoint was occurrence of major or minor access-site related vascular complications in accordance with Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Technical success rates (at exit from procedure room) were used to assess procedural efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 79 ± 7 years and 49 % were male. From C1 to C2, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality reduced numerically (from 4.1 to 3.6 %, p = 0.060). Procedures became more streamlined with use of local anesthesia in 100 % (83 % in C2) and the left axillary artery in 76 % (68 % in C2). The primary (safety) endpoint occurred in 34 % of the patients, but reduced from 45 % in C1 to 16 % in C2 (p = 0.011). Concurrently, there was a reduction in VCD failure (45 vs 14 % [incomplete arteriotomy closure in all 5 cases], p = 0.003), bleeding complications (45 vs 14 %, p = 0.003) and bailout vascular surgery/stenting (40 % vs. 16 %, p = 0.021). Technical success was 80 % in C1 and 87 % in C2 (p = 0.45) and median length of hospital stay reduced from 5 (25th-75th percentile: 2-7) to 3 days (25th-75th percentile: 2-5, p = 0.080).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The unilateral, suture-based dry-closure technique facilitates safe and effective access management in high-risk patients selected for percutaneous TAx-TAVI procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAx-TAVI) is the most used alternative access when severe iliofemoral disease renders transfemoral access infeasible. Compared to surgical transaxillary access, a true percutaneous approach using vascular closure devices (VCD) has advantages but can be challenging. Herein, we describe the impact of the "unilateral, suture-mediated, dry-closure technique" on vascular safety and efficacy in patients undergoing true percutaneous TAx-TAVI.

Methods: A total of 77 patients undergoing percutaneous TAx-TAVI were categorized into a cohort before (C1, n = 40) and after (C2, n = 37) implementation of the suture-based dry-closure technique using an upstream occlusion balloon. In C1, arteriotomy closure mainly consisted of plug-based VCD. The primary (safety) endpoint was occurrence of major or minor access-site related vascular complications in accordance with Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Technical success rates (at exit from procedure room) were used to assess procedural efficacy.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 79 ± 7 years and 49 % were male. From C1 to C2, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality reduced numerically (from 4.1 to 3.6 %, p = 0.060). Procedures became more streamlined with use of local anesthesia in 100 % (83 % in C2) and the left axillary artery in 76 % (68 % in C2). The primary (safety) endpoint occurred in 34 % of the patients, but reduced from 45 % in C1 to 16 % in C2 (p = 0.011). Concurrently, there was a reduction in VCD failure (45 vs 14 % [incomplete arteriotomy closure in all 5 cases], p = 0.003), bleeding complications (45 vs 14 %, p = 0.003) and bailout vascular surgery/stenting (40 % vs. 16 %, p = 0.021). Technical success was 80 % in C1 and 87 % in C2 (p = 0.45) and median length of hospital stay reduced from 5 (25th-75th percentile: 2-7) to 3 days (25th-75th percentile: 2-5, p = 0.080).

Conclusions: The unilateral, suture-based dry-closure technique facilitates safe and effective access management in high-risk patients selected for percutaneous TAx-TAVI procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信